Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7; P-Marlowe; drstevej
Let me suggest that you use the term "non-Calvinist" to describe our esteemed opponents. I am certain that Marlowe won't object to this moniker. (Please correct me if I am wrong.)

For me, at least, there is too much effort required to find the right bucket of beliefs that our opponents hold, many of them shifting like wind blown sand. Thus, it is easier to characterize them by what they are not, they are not Calvinists, and I leave it at that.

I make a few exceptions to this rule, but mainly regarding those who are on our "side" of the fence. An example is drstevej, an honest Amyraldian.

538 posted on 08/01/2002 5:57:18 AM PDT by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies ]


To: Jerry_M; RnMomof7; restornu
***An example is drstevej, an honest Amyraldian. ***

Some other suggestions:

'Amicable Amyraldian' or
'Limited Attainment Calvinist' or
'Inconsistent Calvinist'?

Actually, I like restornu's term "Viper"


541 posted on 08/01/2002 6:13:31 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson