[medved]

I hope somebody is taking note of the outright waste of bandwidth which "PatrickHenry" is perpetrating here, e.g. post 297, e.g. post 283 e.g. post 285, e.g. post 286...

Basically none of these posts have any possibility of contributing anything at all to anybody's understanding of the evolution/creation debate. Post 297 involves a 60K byte jpeg file, which is three times the combined size of the two information files which I post (once) on these threads but, wonder of wonders, I do not see JennyP doing her wretched little crybaby act over a member of her own clique hogging up valuable bandwidth in such manner.

Just something to think about the next time these five or six people level this accusation of "spamming" against me. You can be certain that I shall refer the moderator to this page if that ever happens again.

[Gumlegs]

PatrickHenry is pointing out how fatuous the logic is in trying to connect Darwin and Hitler.

Who's the crybaby?

[Stultis]

Basically none of these posts have any possibility of contributing anything at all to anybody's understanding of the evolution/creation debate.

Who was president last time you remember having a sense of humor?

[balrog666]

Basically none of these posts have any possibility of contributing anything at all to anybody's understanding of the evolution/creation debate.

BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA. Like your posts contribute to the discussion ...?

[PatrickHenry]

This may be one of the funniest things I've seen in our threads in a long time -- medved is complaining that someone is wasting bandwith.

I hope somebody is taking note of the outright waste of bandwidth which "PatrickHenry" is perpetrating here ...

305 posted on 7/22/02 4:28 PM Eastern by medved

[VadeRetro]

Post 297 involves a 60K byte jpeg file, which is three times the combined size of the two information files which I post (once) on these threads . . .

A toughie quiz:

Linking a 60K picture adds how much size to FR's online database?

1) 60K
2) The size of the <img src="http:(address)"> tag
3) Nothing.

[gore3000]

Basically none of these posts have any possibility of contributing anything at all to anybody's understanding of the evolution/creation debate. Post 297 involves a 60K byte jpeg file, which is three times the combined size of the two information files which I post (once) on these threads

You have to realize that evolutionists use a different dictionary than normal people. To them evidence = spam. To them insults = evidence. To them filibuster = no need to discuss the facts. Evolutionists are very deceitful people who copy the tactics of the charlatan Darwin every chance they get.