Basically none of these posts have any possibility of contributing anything at all to anybody's understanding of the evolution/creation debate. Post 297 involves a 60K byte jpeg file, which is three times the combined size of the two information files which I post (once) on these threads but, wonder of wonders, I do not see JennyP doing her wretched little crybaby act over a member of her own clique hogging up valuable bandwidth in such manner.
Just something to think about the next time these five or six people level this accusation of "spamming" against me. You can be certain that I shall refer the moderator to this page if that ever happens again.
Who's the crybaby?
Who was president last time you remember having a sense of humor?
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHA. Like your posts contribute to the discussion ...?
I hope somebody is taking note of the outright waste of bandwidth which "PatrickHenry" is perpetrating here ...305 posted on 7/22/02 4:28 PM Eastern by medved
A toughie quiz:
Linking a 60K picture adds how much size to FR's online database?
1) 60K
2) The size of the <img src="http:(address)"> tag
3) Nothing.
You have to realize that evolutionists use a different dictionary than normal people. To them evidence = spam. To them insults = evidence. To them filibuster = no need to discuss the facts. Evolutionists are very deceitful people who copy the tactics of the charlatan Darwin every chance they get.