Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
The above is one of the many reasons why the only 'scientists' actively promoting evolution the last 50 years have been two atheist non-biologists by the name of Gould and Dawkins. -me-

Oh, my, that's a keeper, an instant classic. LOL! Can somebody save that quote?

I am glad you like since I will certainly keep it. I do notice that you cannot refute my post showing that the 2001 Nobel Prize did indeed favor ID and contradict evolution. Gould and Dawkins did not have a scientific bone in their bodies. Real scientists know way too much to put out the garbage they did. And here's another one you can keep - evolution is pseudo-science for morons.

257 posted on 07/22/2002 5:30:39 AM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
I do notice that you cannot refute my post showing that the 2001 Nobel Prize did indeed favor ID and contradict evolution.

Did you ever notice there's a difference between "cannot" and "did not"?

ID predicts the total interrelatedness of organisms. Evolution predicts a stochastic organization of the life functions.

Ever notice that evolution doesn't do this?

Ever learned to count to two?

266 posted on 07/22/2002 7:27:20 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson