Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
By the way, since Vennari seems so concerned with Pius’ warnings:
"Today, thanks to the Vatican II revolution, Pius warnings have been flagrantly disregarded by Church authorities."
I’ll add this, also from Pius XII and Mediator Dei, at least from parts of it conveniently ignored by Vennari and fans, probably because Pius makes it explicit that his warnings are directed to those like Vennari who would set themselves above the Church authorities who have the rightful power to change the Mass. Speaking of the Mass, Pius XII said:
22. As circumstances and the needs of Christians warrant, public worship is organized, developed and enriched by new rites, ceremonies and regulations, always with the single end in view, "that we may use these external signs to keep us alert, learn from them what distance we have come along the road, and by them be heartened to go on further with more eager step; for the effect will be more precious the warmer the affection which precedes it."[25] Here then is a better and more suitable way to raise the heart to God. Thenceforth the priesthood of Jesus Christ is a living and continuous reality through all the ages to the end of time, since the liturgy is nothing more nor less than the exercise of this priestly function.

. . . .

49. From time immemorial the ecclesiastical hierarchy has exercised this right in matters liturgical. It has organized and regulated divine worship, enriching it constantly with new splendor and beauty, to the glory of God and the spiritual profit of Christians. What is more, it has not been slow--keeping the substance of the Mass and sacraments carefully intact--to modify what it deemed not altogether fitting, and to add what appeared more likely to increase the honor paid to Jesus Christ and the august Trinity, and to instruct and stimulate the Christian people to greater advantage.[47]

It is the hierarchy that choses when to add or subtract from the liturgy, not Pope Vennari.

Vennari also ignores that Cardinal Ottaviani, whose intervention he greatly relies on here, made that intervention before the final version of the Novus Ordo was issued. Once the Pope clarified some things and issued the final version Ottaviani repudiated that intervention.

As previously stated, Vennari is not reliable. His comments don’t get any more accurate after these.

Dominus Vobiscum

patent  +AMDG

20 posted on 07/08/2002 10:48:45 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: patent
"Once the Pope clarified some things and issued the final version Ottaviani repudiated that intervention. "

Thank you for mentioning this as it is not well known.
50 posted on 07/09/2002 10:40:09 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson