[narses]

"Recently, you spread falsehoods concerning the Vatican's relationship with the FSSP."

Not true. I posted what I had heard and backed that up in most instances with actual statements from the Vatican and other sources. You seized on a couple items that I have yet to "prove" but you have no evidence that they are not true and to claim that I spread lies is calumny. I said clearly my data was second-hand. Further, the treatment of the FSSP that I documented demonstrates how difficult trust is today.

[u57896]

You could not possibly be from the SSPX as I have heard their bishops(Williamson)rant about how Internet availability is an occasion of sin.

[St.Chuck]

I posted what I had heard and backed that up in most instances from the Vatican and other sources.

You backed absolutely nothing up.

You seized on a couple items that I have yet to "prove" but you have no evidence that they are not true and to claim I spread lies is calumny. I said clearly my data was second hand.

I refuted what you said with firsthand information. Empirical knowlege. You may have "heard" that I am wearing a crucifix around my neck. But if you were truly in possesion of the facts, you would KNOW that I am actually wearing a miraculous medal. There is nothing you could say, post, or link that would convince me otherwise.

It's disappointing that you admit that you "have yet to prove" anything, but accuse me of calumny. I know your claims to be false, you cannot prove them to be true, yet I am the one guilty of calumny. How rich.