Sex Abuse Wars

CBS insider Bernard Goldberg in his book “Bias” compared the “media elite” to the “old Soviet Union” dictators as well as to Mafia bosses. The “News Mafia” as Goldberg calls the media recently let its “reporters” know that the regime will not allow dissidence against it’s ally the gay movement. The recent crack down on dissenters is national, international and regional.

Sam Donaldson and Cokie Roberts shouted George Will down on ABC's "This Week" because he tried to report that the vast majority of priest sexual abusers are homosexuals. NewMax editor Phil Brennan said, “After three or four attempts to get a word in edgewise, Will gave up.”

Pope John Paul II’s spokesman Dr. Joaquin Navarro-Valls in Rome was “greeted with a wave of protest.” The Jewish World Review said Navarro-Valls got this greeting because he made the “link between homosexuality and sexual abuse by priests.”

Covering the Dallas Bishop’s sex abuse meeting, the National Review’s online preview of it’s July 1 issue said: “I'm hearing from inside press circles that reporters, editors and producers don't want to look at the gay issue. Michael S. Rose, author of Goodbye, Good Men [a book on homosexual abuses within the church] is in Dallas. I spoke yesterday to a TV reporter who wants to interview Rose about his findings, but who received word from the top to stay away from him.”

These are only a few cases of the mass media’s official suppression of the widely known fact that the vast majority of sexual abusers are homosexuals. Cokie, Sam and their media accomplices are enforcing censorship that echoes memories of Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany.

However, before the recent crack down was solidified, U.S. News & World Report columnist John Leo reported that studies have shown that 5 percent or less of priests fit the pedophile description. He said, "Most sexual victims of priests are teenage boys [abused in homosexual acts], according to one estimate. A study of Chicago's 2,200 priests identified 40 sexual abusers, only one of whom was a pedophile."

To get news at the time of the Dallas bishops meetings reporters had to enter the underground world of homosexual spin organizations through their websites. For example, on June 15, the homosexual “information” group Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation

(GLAAD) through their moles in the church reported news that the mass media censored. Homosexual activist Cathy Renna writing for the GLAAD’s website said, “

“We also learned more late last night about the anti-gay proposal offered by Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Neb. Bruskewitz's "Amendment 27" would have stated that because the "current homosexual culture" was the root cause of the sex-abuse crisis, the bishops would be required to force strict conformity with all church doctrines on sexuality. His proposal was soundly rejected on a voice vote, with a source inside the meeting telling me that it received only perhaps a half-dozen votes of support.”

During a victory get together, Renna said she met with “a number of familiar media faces” and Anne Barrett Doyle of the Coalition of Concerned Catholics who is a member of the steering committee for the lay reform movement Voice of the Faithful.

According to Renna, “Anne was one of the first people I spoke with back in March when we were cultivating resources and contacts to offer media outlets...Seeing Anne at the cathedral brought to mind how far we've come in the past months.”

During those months, Cokie, Sam and the “News Mafia” had censored George Will, Pope John Paul II’s spokesman, and the almost all conservative spokespersons in Dallas who attempted to report the “link between homosexuality and sexual abuse by priests,” which the U.S. News & World Report detailed before the crack down.

(Although to be fair, the crack down broke down for a moment when Fox News host Brit Hume drolly said allowing sex abusing priests to marry wouldn’t help “unless you let them marry men or little boys.”)

But for the most part, only gay approved “Catholic” lay reform activists like Anne Barrett Doyle who together with the gay movement worked for months cultivating “resources and contacts to offer media outlets,” were allowed to fully present their political agenda as “news” at Dallas.

Time magazine in it’s June 17 issue, not to be outdone by the gay movement’s GLAAD, had it’s own “Catholic” lay reform activist Mary Jo Bane come forward to help the church in its time of need. Bane said to Time that her “Catholic” lay organization and “power” plans were not “radical.”

However, according to attorney Gregory A. Hession, president of Family Legal Services, Bane is a radical. He said at his website:

“They hate family autonomy, parental authority, home schoolers, and church authority.

This is not an exaggeration. Dr. Mary Jo Bane, [former] Clinton’s Assistant Secretary of Administration for Children and Families in the Department of Health and Human Services, said: ‘If we want to talk about equality of opportunity for children, then the fact that children are raised in families means there's no equality . . . In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them.’ Her federal department is in charge of the national effort to mold state DSS [Department of Social Services] departments into their image.“

“That is what the communists believe. The following statement issued at a congress of Russian Communist Party educators in 1918 sounds like the credo of the modern DSS agent.”

This Clintonian bureaucratic experience is probably why the media and certain bishops are promoting Bane’s Hillary-like governmental ideas of centralized take over of church and family autonomy and authority. The bishops in Dallas created an Office for Child and Youth Protection to promote “safe environments” for children. Some have noted that so-called governmental “safe schools” and “safe spaces” are used by gay activists to promote homosexual agendas.

Some have joked that this is “an extension of the full employment act for homosexual and liberal church bureaucrats.” Some wonder if this is not another way to attack the very ones who for two decades have been fighting against homosexual sex abuse and other abuses in the church- that is the faithful orthodox Catholic laity and priests.

The Child Protection Services under the DSS agents are notorious for taking children away from parents without any proof or due process with usually only anonymous accusations. With the homosexual network inside the church called the “lavender mafia” in control of many diocese bureaucracies will orthodox laity and priests be targeted while homosexual sex abuser are protected by their gay allies?

Many believe that the homosexual network within the church protected the gay sex abuser at the Dallas meeting. As the National Review’s Rod Dreher pointed out on the June 13 “the need to avoid the "elephant in the sacristy [the fact that the vast majority of priest sexual abusers are homosexuals]," in Mary Eberstadt's memorable phrase, is perhaps the only point on which the bishops and the media agree.”

To this end, the bishops running the Dallas meeting, according to the June 13 National Review article, had staged “briefings for the media on various aspects of the abuse scandal“ by psychiatric panelists such as Rev. Canice Connors, Rev. Stephen Rossetti and others with a pro-homosexual agenda.

Connors is known among sex abused victims for his psychiatric and "spiritual assessment" of mass pedophile Fr. John Geoghan. He wrote, "there are no particular recommendations concerning his spiritual life since he is involved in spiritual direction and seems to have a good prayer life."

While accepting psychiatric advice from the likes of Connors, the bishops in control of the meeting, however, refused the expertise of Catholic Medical Association‘s (CMA) psychiatrists who are faithful to the church‘s full teachings. The CPA considered so-called expert Stephen Rossetti’s advice to bishops as creating a “big part” in the sex abuse problem.

National Review’s Dreher said, “The Rev. Stephen Rossetti, current president of St. Luke's, who is believed by some psychiatrists associated with the Catholic Medical Association to have been a big part of the problem, owing to the advice he's been giving bishops. Rossetti has most recently been downplaying the role homosexuality plays in the scandal.”

The “lavender mafia”(the homosexual network within the church) was probably why the Catholic Medical Association‘s psychiatrists were banned according to Derher. According to psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover the American Psychiatric Association (APA) had its own “lavender mafia” when it voted to “normalize homosexuality” in the early 1970’s.

The non-scientific as well as non-democratic Marxist and Nazi strategy used by the “lavender mafia” for its successful coup of the APA was explained by Satinover. The tactics used against the APA in the “normalization of homosexuality” are presented in his book “Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth.” The Congressional Records of May 1996 called it the “best book on homosexuality written in our times.”

Satinover said, “[T]he leadership of a homosexual faction within the APA planned a ‘systematic effort to disrupted the annual meetings of the American Psychiatric Association.’ They defended this method of ‘influence’ on the grounds that the APA represented ‘psychiatry as a social institution’ rather than a scientific body or professional guild.”

As all can see the “News Mafia” and the “lavender mafia” (the gay movement) are not respecters of freedom of speech or scientific bodies. They have created their own Iron Curtain, which is suppression of free speech.

The Berlin Wall was the symbol of Marxist ideology. Goldberg in “Bias” called ABC, NBC and CBS the three big “News Mafia” families. These “Big Three” are a large basis of the gay movement’s power. The “News Mafia” is the New Berlin Wall that is even now starting to crumble, as did the Berlin Wall and the “evil empire” that build that wall.

Goldberg’s “Bias” is like Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn's "Gulag Archipelago, the beginning of the end for the new “evil empire.” If talk radio and news sources like NewsMax continue to courageously fight the bias and lies of the “Big Three,” then they will crumble as more and more viewer leave them.

But, even the “Big Three” are only stooges of the New York Times and Washington Post. Goldberg said, “The problem is that so many TV journalists simply don’t know how to think about certain issues until the New York Times and the Washington Post tell them what to think. Those big, important newspapers set the agenda that network news people follow.”

In the case of the newspaper of record, the gay movement appears to hold in bondage the New York Time in more ways than one. NewsMax ran an article about Accuracy in Media’s Reed Irving’s inquiry into the NY Times bias. Irving said Richard Berke, a national political correspondent for the Times, spoke at a gathering of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association.

Irvine says that Berke assured the homosexual group that the Times would remain very receptive to the gay agenda because "three-fourths of those who regularly attend the daily meetings that determine what will be on the front page of the Times the next morning are ‘not-so-closeted’ homosexuals."

Goldberg unwittingly in analogy showed a simular situation at CBS when he said, “If CBS News were a prison instead of a journalistic enterprise, three-quarters of the producers and 100 percent of the vice presidents would be Dan’s [Rather’s] bitches.” Norman Mailer explains why the totalitarian relationship Dan Rather had with his CBS News producers and vice-presidents as well as his denial of natural objective truths can lead to a Nietzschean will to power situation.

Norman Mailer, in his book "Prisoner of Sex," shows why this moving away from natural objective truths such as heterosexual sex can lead to the homosexual prison totalitarian will to power:

"So, yes, [homosexuals] in prison strive to become part of the male population, and indeed – it is the irony of homosexuality – try to take on the masculine powers of the man who enters them, even as the studs, if Genet is our accurate guide, become effeminate over the years.... Heterosexual sex with contraception is become by this logic a form of sexual currency closer to the homosexual than the heterosexual, a clearinghouse for power, a market for psychic power in which the stronger will use the weaker, and the female in the act, whether possessed of a vagina or phallus, will look to ingest or steal the masculine qualities of the dominator."

This totalitarian will to power and denial natural objective truths may be the reason why Goldberg considered the media’s anti-conservative bias against the great “social” issues such as abortion and homosexuality to be even greater than against the “Democrat-versus-Republican sort” of issues. He said, “Why were we doing PR for the AIDS lobby by spreading an epidemic of fear, telling our viewers about how AIDS was about to break out into mainstream heterosexual America, which simply was not true?”

But, even in this there is a political dimension, former Governor Pete du Pont pointed out in a Wall Street Journal article after the Bush-Gore 2000 presidential race that when he compared maps, the adult video rental map and the map of the counties that went for Gore were the same.

E. Michael Jones, the editor of Culture War magazine said, “If they want to survive as a party, the Republicans have to understand first of all, how sexual liberation is a form of political control, and secondly, how the Democrats increase their political power by mobilizing sexual deviance...things like pornography and its scholastic variant, sex education, in addition to abortion and homosexuality...Those who are stupid enough to identify themselves with their sexual vices can always look to the Democratic Party and the dominant media culture as sympathetic to...guarantee his bondage.”

The next battle in this war for freedom against the gay-media axis is again in the Catholic Church. The gay movements spin organization GLAAD has already pointed to the next battle:

“With the Apostolic Visitations of U.S. seminaries expected to begin in August (and expected to last for two years), Dignity/USA and other church reform groups are going to be monitoring to see whether Vatican leaders will quietly attempt to purge gay men from the priesthood. GLAAD will be working closely with Dignity and our respective contacts inside the church to make sure the media are closely monitoring the process and outcomes of these visitations.”

Time‘s May 20 issue in its preparation for the Apostolic Visitations of U.S. seminaries showed its strategy by using words like "hate" and "scapegoat" to color faithful Catholics and the Church's attempt to uphold its 20-century-old moral teachings in its own seminaries. The piece quoted a homosexual priest saying, "We're all sort of like Anne Frank's family, up in the attic, waiting for the Nazis to come."

This is the same Soviet-Clinton strategy used on CBS insider Goldberg after he wrote about bias in the media. The liberal Goldberg was ripped as a right-wing scoundrel by Dan Rather and other media elites using words like “wacky charge,” “weird,” “bizarre” and “political activist” to discredit him and “divert attention” from the media elite’s bias.

This shows that the dominant media is one of the last bastions of suppression of free speech within its own sovereign domain since the fall of the USSR. Goldberg in his own words was made a “nonperson” because he used his constitution right of free speech to expose corruption in the Soviet Republics of CBS, ABC and NBC.

As liberal Goldberg said, “ I was pointing fingers at the media elite, which only proved that I was the one who had a bias problem. Wasn’t this what used to happen- on a much scarier and devastating scale, for sure- in the old Soviet Union? A dissident says the elite are corrupt, so the elite throw him in the Gulag because his accusations proves beyond any doubt...that the dissident is insane.”

As in the case of Goldberg, the media elite’s Soviet-Clinton strategy against the Catholic Church is false. It’s strategy of using words like “Nazis,” "hate" and "scapegoat" to color faithful Catholics and the Church's attempt to uphold its 20-century-old moral teachings in its own seminaries is in fact the opposite of the truth.

According to Michael Rose‘s accounts in "Goodbye! Good Men," the orthodox heterosexual seminarians are the victims of Nazi- or Stalinist-like strategies not the homosexual network.

Father John Trigilio of the Harrisburg diocese, said to Rose that the Nazi- or Stalinist-like totalitarian gay subculture in the seminary that included the faculty made his 12 years in the schools something out of Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn's "Gulag Archipelago."

Also, in Rose’s book, a priest in the diocese of Austin, in reference to the pro-homosexual seminaries, said: "... the dynamic paralleled the brain-washing strategies of the Communist re-education camps. Even the connotations of the terms 'rigid,' 'pre-conciliar,' 'anti-community' resonated with Communist terms like 'Capitalist,' 'bourgeois,' and 'anti-democratic.' "

All persons who love freedom must be prepared to monitor the gay-media axis’ spin and tactics of “influence” at the Vatican’s Apostolic Visitations of U.S. seminaries.

Here's another article, from the Wanderer via Virtuosity.com

Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 01:31:10 EDT
Reply-To: DVirtue236@AOL.COM
Sender: David Virtue
From: David Virtue
Subject: 17. ADVICE TO BISHOPS: SUE YOUR EXPERTS. Kinsey Expert Speaks Out

The following is an extraordinary interview with Judith Reisman, who exposed the sexuality mess back in 1987. She was co-author of Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud, with Edward Eichel, ringing the bell on the horrendous fraud perpetrated by Kinsey, upon which the pseudo-academic backup for the sexual revolution was built.

Go to her website at http://www.drjudithreisman.org/ for more info.

She has done a monumental work in mining the evidence and information behind the scam which has killed more Americans than all our wars put together.

The Wanderer: National Catholic Weekly,

Dr. Judith Reisman, Kinsey expert, speaks out....

THE REAL EXPERT ADVISES BISHOPS: SUE YOUR EXPERTS

by Paul Likoudis

As the U.S. bishops prepared for their summer plenary assembly in Dallas to chart their way through a minefield of exploding clerical sex abuse scandals, a group of medical and legal experts, including Dr. Judith Reisman, author of Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, have advised the bishops to take legal actions against their legal and medical experts who offered them the disastrous advice that brought them to the present crisis.

But Dr. Reisman, the nation's leading expert on the sexual psychopaths who created and sustain the so-called "human sexuality education" industry, fears the bishops will miss a golden, "God-given" opportunity to establish in a court of law that the bishops - and the American people - were lied to by the top experts in the sex education/counseling/therapy industry.

"Through this scandal," Dr. Reisman said in an extensive telephone interview with The Wanderer, "God has given the bishops a great opportunity - I don't know if they deserve it - to show in a court of law that they and the nation have been lied to for at least four or five decades about human sexuality; that they and the nation were misled, malpracticed. The 'human sexuality' field is not a field, the experts are not experts and the emperor [Kinsey] had no clothes."

"It is only the the biblical model, which the bishops were advised to reject by the late Fr. Michael Peterson [co-author of the 1985 Peterson-Doyle-Mouton report on clergy sex abuse] that protected women and children from this massive pandemic assault visited upon us all by the 'experts in human sexuality.'

"I fear they will not accept the opportunity God has given them," she said a day before the bishops' scheduled meeting.

"If they would challenge the system in a courtroom, they would do such a good deed for the world, for this sexual revolution is a horrible plague. But I fear they don't have the commitment to do that, and this enormous opportunity, just like the children who have been abused, will be discarded."

The paper written by Reisman and others, submitted to a select group of bishops, is titled, "Reliance of the Catholic Church on Sexuality Advisors Whose Moral Foundation Differs Markedly from that of the Church."

It informs the bishops that "Catholic institutions have long naively relied on sexuality professionals whose advice and counsel has been based on fraudulent science that had as its sole purpose the sweeping aside of the traditional generative view of American -- indeed Catholic -- morality.

NO LEGAL DEFENSE FOR THE BUGGERS

"This misplaced trust afforded to fraudulent sex 'science' appears to be at the heart of much of the Church's recent difficulties. Specifically, many of the Church's key sexuality advisors are associated with the views advanced by Dr. Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana via Kinsey's seminal research; Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953)."

Kinseys assertion that ten-to-40 percent of the male population is homosexual at one stage in life was based on his study of incarcerated, predominantly homosexual, sex offenders, and that Kinsey and his colleagues were the driving force behind the legalization of fornication, adultery, bestiality, pedophilia and other immoral, harmful behaviors.

The paper also advises the bishops that a potential pool of plaintiffs for a class-action suit against the sex education/counseling/therapy industry - whose major institutions are Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Indiana University, home of the Kinsey Institute, and the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco - can be found in the sexually harassed or dismissed seminarians who "suffered under the auspices of Kinseyan-tainted materials used in admissions criteria, psychological testing, teaching, textbooks and 'counseling.'

"Since there is almost no legal defense against such indefensible conditions or actions, the best measure the Church can take is a pro- active, assertive tactic against those who falsely held themselves out as human sexuality experts," the report states.

For more than two decades, the report continues, since Reisman's groundbreaking work, Kinsey, Sex & Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People, honest, legitimate professionals have known that Kinsey and his peers, financed through the foundations (especially the Rockefeller Foundation), organized vice and the pornography racket, were engaged in a grand and diabolical scheme to replace traditional, Judeo-Christian sexual morality with sexual libertinism.

The report also provides two examples that "illustrate how the Church's response to sexuality issues has fallen into the wrong hands.

"First....some seminarians have been trained in sexuality via a program sometimes called Sexual Attitude Reassessment created by The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality (IASHS). IASHS' former Academic Dean, Wardell Pomeroy, (now deceased) was a Kinsey co-author and, according to a recent sympathetic Kinsey biographer, Kinsey's sometime sex partner. (James Jones, Alfred C. Kinsey; A Public/Private Life, W/.W. Norton, New York, 1997)

"Dr. Pomeroy is on record as seeking funds from the Adult Film Association annual convention in February of 1979 to produce child pornography at the IASHS (which produced pornography for sale). Pomeroy's IASHS staff and faculty also performed group, couple and single person illegal sexual conduct--including child pornography -- for the IASHS photographic book, Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality (1977)."

TRAINING THE TRAINERS

SAR workshops, seminars and programs are typically two, three or even five-day events where groups of students, employees, managers, corporate executives and others are immersed in intense "attitude readjustment" techniques designed to break down traditional moral beliefs and behaviors, and often have as their goal the acceptance and practice of homosexuality.

Typical of such programs is that offered in the corporate world by Brian McNaught, a longtime homosexual activist and former editor of the Michigan Catholic, who as long ago as 1980 was pushing the gay agenda in the Church in the pages of U.S. Catholic. (See "Is Our Church Big Enough for Gay Catholics?" June 1980, p. 10, cited by Fr. Enrique Rueda in The Homosexual Network, p. 111).

Brian McNaught associates offer such intensive programs as: "Understanding Gay Issues In The Workplace," which "explores the impact of anti-gay behaviors on productivity and examines the means of eliminating unprofessional conduct at work"; "Managing Gay Issues In The Workplace," which aims "at building the confidence and competence of managers and associates in their response to gay issues in the workplace"; "Train the Trainer," a full-day workshop "designed for individuals who are interested in honing their skills and enhancing their confidence as a presenter and/or trainer on gay and transgender issues....The 'Train the Trainer' session occurs on the last day of the Annual Workshop on Sexuality," which itself is "designed for every person who wishes to become more knowledgeable and comfortable with the multiple aspects and expressions of human sexuality...."

This latter program is especially designed for teachers, administrators, students, diversity and human resources professionals, family life educators, health and counseling personnel, mental health specialists, nurses, physicians, and clergy.

LAW STILL TAKING BAD ADVICE

The Reisman, et. al. report to the bishops also points out (as does the web site of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) that Dr. Fred Berlin is still advising Cardinal Bernard Law and the U.S. bishops.

Indeed, Berlin was scheduled to address reporters during the bishops' Dallas meeting.

"In 1994," the report states, "Dr. Berlin was Course Director for a training program offered to judges, 'health professionals,' lawyers, legislators, police officers and child advocacy workers teaching, among other things, that 'pedophilia....can be effectively controlled with appropriate psychiatric intervention.'

"Dr. Berlin and John Money, Ph.D., co-founded a celebrated sexual training and treatment center, The Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic. Dr. Berlin described Dr. Money as 'one of his most important mentors.' Dr. Money, as it turns out, was a dedicated Kinsey disciple, the mentor for June Reinisch (the third Kinsey Institute director) and on the advisory board of the Kinsey Institute. Additionally, in an interview with the pedophile periodical, The Journal of Paedeophilia, John Money offered his professional counsel that adult sex with children is normal and often beneficial. "Dr. Money went on to say in the pedophile interview that the Berlin/Money Sexual Disorders Clinic was designed to offer 'leeway to judges' to free child abusers. For Money, 'decided regarding paedohilia [sic] that I would never report anybody'....In addition to Cardinal Law's reported reliance on Dr. Berlin, the problem is compounded in that the founder of St. Luke's Institute, Rev. Michael R. Peterson, M.D. (who later died of AIDS), urges the Church to rely on Berlin, and Money in a 1985 paper, after warning the clergy that:

[M]alpractice cases involve situations where clerics give advice which is considered by the civil courts to be beyond their sphere of expertise or competence. This advice allegedly causes catastrophic consequences (divorce, suicide) resulting in civil suits.....[Money and Berlin,] the two mental health professionals are considered by me and most people in the field as the two U.S. experts and ones who have had good success in treatment of the paraphilic disorders in the past fifteen years (circa 1970) at their Clinic."

"Church advisers like Peterson, Money, Berlin and their institutional sponsors such as Johns Hopkins University, The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, etc.," the report continues, "are possibly subject to civil liability for medical malpractice, fraud, negligence and other claims.

"Several articles from Maryland papers are attached identifying Berlin's efforts to 'exempt specialists from reporting pedophiles even when their crimes continue during treatment.'

"Berlin's claims of success would mislead Church officials regarding the safety of returning 'treated' pederasts and pedophiles to work. Indeed, the Government Accounting Office's 1996 report on sex offenders -- spanning 50 years and 500 therapeutic programs -- found no form of psychotherapy that actually stopped sexual predators."

"Still, in the admissions protocol for their program, Berlin and Money guarantee those engaged in past, present or future child sexual abuse, 'We will not, however, report to your Probation Officer information you tell us as a part of the normal doctor-patient privileged relationship.'

"By 1988 'at least eight men [were] convicted of sexually abusing Maryland children while under treatment' at the Johns Hopkins clinic,' supporting the Maryland Attorney General's rejection of Dr. Berlin's effort to cover-up ongoing child abuse.

KEELER'S EXPERT

"Moreover, Dr. Paul McHugh, as former Johns Hopkins director of psychiatry and a member of the Baltimore Archdiocese's Independent Review Board on Child Sexual Matters was fully supportive of Berlin's efforts to protect even active pedophiles in treatment at Johns Hopkins...."

According to Dr. Reisman, the troubles the Church is currently buried in date back to the 1930s and '40s, when Kinsey and his cohorts and their financial backers promoted themselves as the possessors of a new, scientific understanding of human sexuality, and positioned themselves as the educators of countless teachers, social workers and clerics, including Catholic bishops and priests.

"We know," she explained in her Wanderer interview, "that the whole basis of the human sexuality education programs delivered to clergy of every denomination - not just Catholics - was based on the most massive cover-up of child sexual abuse in the history of American science, and the cover-up is continuing.

"The Kinsey institute from the start was created to normalize pedophilia. So in Kinsey we have a sado-masochistic, bi-homosexual, pornography and masturbation addict, a mysogynist who forced his wife and the wives of his staff to perform sex for him and his camera in his attic, who directed pedophiles to sexually molest children as young as two months of age for his 'scientific human sexuality data,' who directed a member of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany in child sexual abuse techniques, who - as his laudatory biography reported -- climbed into a bathtub to circumcise himself without anesthesia, and who ritualistically hung himself by his testicles from a pole at the university until he fell unconscious: this clinically definable sexual psychopath is the educator who trained your psychiatrists, psychologists, some of your bishops and priests, and other mental health officials in what is normal human sexuality.

"There was no field of human sexuality before Kinsey, and it was Kinsey who educated all of our legislators to change our sex laws, to liberalize them following the call, in 1955, of the American Law Institute's Model Penal Code, which itself was influenced by Kinsey and his cohorts."

Kinsey, Reisman further explained, was an adoring disciple of Britain's "great beast," Alastair Crowley, considered the "prophet of pedophilia" and a known satanist.

The Wanderer asked her if there was a link between satanism and pederasty, and she responded:

"Yes, certainly....

"There is a direct link between Kinsey and Crowley, as I showed in my book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences.

"Kinsey visited Crowley's lair or 'abbey' in Sicily, as a pilgrim who goes to a religious place of holy worship. Crowley, we know was involved in ritualistic sacrifices of various kinds, including the ritualistic sexual abuse, and deaths, of children. Kinsey went to Crowley's lair to adore Crowley's images of people in copulatory positions.

"Kinsey's promotion of children as sexual objects for adults to consume is of a piece with Crowley and the whole concept of satanic human sacrifice. Clearly, we sacrifice our children when we engage in sex with them. Those who do it, know it.

"Pedophilia, or more commonly, pederasty, is a form of human sacrifice. Anyone who assaults a child sexually knows they are not only killing that child's soul, but some would say, from a psychotherapeutic perspective, they are turning that child into a dysfunctional, self- destructive individual, and they know the child-victim will also act out on other children, perhaps hundreds, the rest of his life, and so the human destruction is perpetuated.

"From a religious perspective, that is a satanic act. My view is not religious, but I see that interpretation."

Reisman also described as "double-edged" claims by bishops that they didn't fully understand the terrible physical, emotional and spiritual damage caused by sex abusers, because they were seeking, and accepting, advice from "experts" who insisted they had the right to "treat pedophiles without turning them over to law enforcement for jury trials.

"The experts, like Fred Berlin who advises Bernard Cardinal Law, as we speak, and others at Johns Hopkins," she said, "were the men who argued before the Maryland legislature that, not only should they have a right to treat pedophiles without turning them over to law enforcement for jury trials, but Berlin even insisted he should have the right to treat pederasts even while they are sexually assaulting and raping children, and not turn them in!

"Berlin, and Money, and the experts at the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, who have been training clergy for decades, are the people regarded as the experts. If you think that they would have suggested there is something wrong with pederasty, you would be mistaken. These are the people directing the Church.

"Should Church authorities have believed such experts? I think that should be up to a jury to decide.

"To me, this is a case of massive medical malpractice by those in the human sexuality field, as well as consumer fraud, as well as a broad spectrum of other things for the lawyers to sort out. But I believe it has to be sorted out. It is important to understand it is not just the priests and the abused children and the Church that have been so damaged, but educators, counselors, social workers, law enforcement officials and others throughout the whole system who have been trained in Kinsey, and are teaching children and doing social and law enforcement work everywhere.

"These so-called 'human sexuality educators' have been teaching behaviors that cause dysfunction, that are anti-authority and anti- Church, and they are teaching children - and adults -- sexually perverse behaviors which can lead to serious emotional, spiritual and physical illness."

"What should Catholic parents - and others - think about programs in Catholic and public schools that promote tolerance and acceptance of homosexual activity?" The Wanderer asked.

Reisman responded: "First, everyone has to understand that the beliefs most people have about sex today are based on bogus, fraudulent, criminal activities mislabeled as science, created by a group of sexual psychopaths at Indiana University.

"People should understand that if a nation follows the model of sexuality designed by a group of sexual psychopaths, that nation can anticipate a massive increase in sexual psychopathology. Remember, Kinsey is the father of the sexual revolution, and he is also considered the father of the homosexual movement by homosexuals and the pornography industry, both of which are always reaching for the children.

"Catholics must understand that all the AIDS programs, all the sex education programs, all the tolerance programs, all the 'safe school' programs have the same goal: recruit. They are recruitment programs for promiscuous sexual activity, either heterosexual or homosexual. They don't belong in any home, much less any school. They are dysfunctional for adults as well as children. Anyone teaching those programs is suspect. Nobody talks about these 'sexual issues' to children without having an ulterior motive.

"It has been my argument for decades that some of the most destructive, toxic people are those in the field of human sexuality, and who are therefore responsible for the training of military chaplains and counselors, for AIDS educators, for cultural diversity, for the training on hate crimes, for the training on STD prevention and human relations in our schools. Everybody, anywhere, who needs the three units of sex education for professional licensing -- psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, counselors, criminologists, expert witnesses in courts, teachers -everyone must get their training from those who come out of the Kinsey model.

"There is no other model for human sexuality, except the biblical one."

When the interview with Dr. Reisman concluded, she said she is "seriously looking" for people who want to sue the leaders of the human sexuality education field and their agents, such as Johns Hopkins, the Kinsey Institute, the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, AASECT (Association of Sex Educators and Therapists), SIECUS (Sex Information and Education Council of the United States), the SSSS (Society for the Scientific Study of Sex) and Planned Parenthood, just for starters. She is also interested in meeting lawyers who would like to represent injured parties in class action suits against the above named associations.

To contact Dr. Reisman, email her at jareisman@surewest.net.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.