Yes, my definition is probably not the same as the common one. I don't believe that people who believe in Replacement Theology are necessarily prejudiced against Jews, but in my experience, when you question many (most?) who are prejudiced against Jews, they cite Replacement Theology to prove their points. Coincidence? I think not.
I do not believe that the church was God's Plan B, or that a saved, sanctified collection of Jews and Gentiles was somehow an unexpected development brought about only because Plan A didn't work out for God. I do not believe that the church is an accident. Indeed, I believe it is aholy priesthood and a chosen people.
Straw man arguments. I never claimed any of the these arguments that you oppose, so what is your point?
This is really not an issue worth burning down the barn over. I am not convinced that disp. theology is Biblical, but I am not convinced that it isn't either. As we are brothers in Christ, I wish you the very best. May you bear much fruit!