The incongruencies vis a vis history, reality and Scripture are HUGELY WORSE BY MANY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE with Replacement Theology. I'm amazed that any smart people would be duped by it. It seems to plainly illogical on SO MANY points the whole length and breadth of it.
Says you. Daniel's prophecy fits perfectly through history until the time of Christ, no huge gaps needed. But even if I believed Daniel had anything left to be fulfilled, that doesn't change the time frame statements of Daniel vs. Revelation. Unless you want to go all out and say that none of Daniel has been fulfilled, a laughable assertion.
The incongruencies vis a vis history, reality and Scripture are HUGELY WORSE BY MANY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE with Replacement Theology. I'm amazed that any smart people would be duped by it. It seems to plainly illogical on SO MANY points the whole length and breadth of it.
If you have a point, it is always best to make it quickly and succinctly, not over twelve pages of multicolored giant font. Nor is it necessary to describe your point. Just make it.
Why do you need an earthly kingdom? Christ Himself said that His kingdom was not of this world. You are making the same mistake that Jews make with regards to the kingdom. What part of "my kingdom is not of this world" do you not understand? For that matter, if God wanted an earthly kingdom, why did Christ reject the efforts to make Him an earthly kingdom after He fed the multitudes?