Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
"Doing" theology (as socialism) replaces the actual teachings of the Catholic Church. Keep in mind, this is posited quite independently of any clear notions of the economy of grace through sacraments.

And the Protestants went through the "social gospel" thing in the 19th century -- not so bizzarely, because such was not available at the time. It always struck me that the "social gospel" was propounded by those who had apparently had little contact with the actual gospel.

I went to a Catholic college in the late 60s. Senior year we had a required course in sacramental theology; naturally, we read such monuments of Catholic scholarship as Teilhard's Phenomenon of Man (hey, at least he was nominally Catholic), Robinson's Honest to God (of which C.S. Lewis remarked, "I'd rather be honest."), Harvey Cox's The Secular City, something of Tillich's that I forget, . . . and so on. I was young and I assumed that in a Catholic college I could trust what was taught. (I found it all incredibly boring, though, and only managed a C.)

278 posted on 05/21/2002 3:53:35 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: maryz
Tillich's project, as well as quite a lot of modern theology, seems a roundabout way to reintroduce ontological/theoretical categories into Protestant theology without being pegged as a Thomist or lapsing into Scholasticism (which, of course, would be...[horrors!] "Catholic").
279 posted on 05/21/2002 3:58:31 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson