Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Post #96 cuts a hypothetical plevnw argument in two. Even that word would not make their case.

Since we're Stephen's namesakes it's great to know he was "full of grace."

100 posted on 05/07/2002 6:24:25 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: drstevej; rnmomof7; gophack; corin stormhands
plnrns xaritos: just as I thought. The Greek would render it as a combination of "full" and of "grace." Is there an alternate reading that has "plnrns xaritos" in the Luke 1:28 passage? (I don't have my text with me...it's still in shipment from Oklahoma...I recently moved.)

As you say, though, if that "plevnw" language were to result in Mary being "immaculately conceived," then it would also have to apply to the Saint Stephen.

What we have, then, is what I orignally stated: the only argument for the "immaculate conception" is a logically derived one. That is, pre-incarnate Jesus, knowing Mary was to be his mother, saw fit to give her the gift of perfection for His benefit and for the removal from him of "original sin," a doctrine that is itself suspect.

102 posted on 05/07/2002 6:36:44 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson