Oh good grief. I answered this post already. The Israeli's most certainly went house to house in both Ramallah and Jenin. That fact is undisputed. They killed an infant on March 4 and a few months before that an 8 year old girl. The 8 year old was killed in a house to house raid by IDF forces. The infant was killed when the IDF botched an assasination attempt and hit the wrong two trucks killing many children and at least one woman.
As I said, people want to call this "collateral damage" or they will claim that the children "had it coming" since their families (it is assertted without any evidence) "support terrorists" and besides it was "self-defense."
Sorry. Sending missiles into crowded intersections is not "self-defense" and is most certainly not avoidance of collateral damage. Live in whatever fantasy world that floats your boat.
Oh good grief. I answered this post already. The Israeli's most certainly went house to house in both Ramallah and Jenin. That fact is undisputed. They killed an infant on March 4 and a few months before that an 8 year old girl. The 8 year old was killed in a house to house raid by IDF forces. The infant was killed when the IDF botched an assasination attempt and hit the wrong two trucks killing many children and at least one woman.You are swinging all over the board here. You have asserted, serially:
- You assert that the Israelis 'went house to house'. Please define this term, since going house to house and SHOOTING EVERYONE THEY CAN like the Palestinians did, differs from going house to house searching yet not shooting.
- You assert that an infant was killed in an intersection. How this in any way supports yout argument is a stunning stretch since we were talking about Israelis going from house to house, indiscriminately killing Palestinians. An intersection is not a house. Point dismissed as non-sequitur.
- You assert that they killed an 8 year old girl in a house to house raid by IDF forces. Please include circumstances -- were the Israelis dressed as Palestinian policemen? Did they shoot everyone they could or was it a strike at a given and identified terrorist? Was it 'house to house', as you assert, or was it a single-house raid? Did they shoot people in their bedrooms indiscriminately, without giving people a chance to identify themselves, like the Palestinians did? Did these slain Palestinians offer weapon-bearing resistance, unlike the unarmed Israelis who were cowering in their bedrooms?
Context is everything, and if I have discovered anything in my dealings with you so far, it is that you will spin, distort, omit important facts, and even physically threaten your ideological opponents. So I will need you to clarify the above points. References to articles will be most appreciated. Please restrict those articles to mainstream media reports, I am not interested in anything from the Holocaust-denier and Jew-hater Hoffman, so please spare me that nonsense.