Posted on 04/27/2002 9:37:19 AM PDT by TheLurkerX
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:33:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
JERUSALEM
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I am going to say this real slow so even you can understand it. The question has no validity, It is based on the lies you told to make a story something it was NOT. Liars always get caught. You are just easier to catch than most. You are a pathetic little person.
Do they actually target children, Yassir, or do the terrorists hide behind children? Oh, wait! Are the terrorist sometimes children?
And, diplomatic actions between one or more liars is a 'waste of time'. No 'peace'.
LMAO! Yeah ya got me. Geeze did your mother have any kids that lived?
You never give up do you? You try one sling of mud - it doesn't stick - you try another tactic - it doesn't stick. So much hate, so little time.
Again, I for one could care less if a man or woman directed the Prince's plane - it is a NON ISSUE. Nobody is telling us anything. This was done as a diplomatic gesture if done at all. I JUST DON'T CARE. So sorry you are upset. Maybe one of these days - something will go as you like it.
The name is Rick. The Israeli's actually target children on occasion. Unless you believe that shooting a 14 year old boy in the back after taunting him to come out and throw rocks at them or blowing up children in a botched assasination attempt is a case of terrorists "hiding behind children." I'd like to know where this particular canard originated. Where is it shown that children are killed because the terrorists hide behind them? And is it common practice for the Police in America to go ahead and shoot the children in a hostage situation so they can get at the criminals? (Other than Waco or Ruby Ridge) Just curious.
Meanwhile children are blown up by terrorists as we look for peace that can not be achieved with out a strong war against terrorism! And goof balls still talk about one more chance this and one more chance that. You don't get it. The Palestinians don't ever want peace. Get it. Understand. They want war so let them get it!
Enough with the blah blah Iraq might have nukes. going to get nukes. will use nukes.
Let's just Nuke them then.
Now thanks to the fearless HalfAMutt these Arab lies are exposed as the vile propaganda they are! No one in Israel besides the "government class" is allowed to have weapons at home! Therefore there are no "armed settlers"! And no doubt that fellow with the submachine gun magazine, pictured in #26, will be shot a dawn by the express command of the sinister dictator Saddam Sharon.
veronica, you should know by now that you can post 500 detailed refutations of Demidog's lies, and he will still be robotically repeating them in post #501. He loves nothing better to come on a thread where people are mourning the dead - a murdered child if possible - and start spewing his nasty drool as widely as he can.
That is the tragedy of it all. You don't find Israeli 12-year olds trying to kill Palestinian babies. The fact that some people can't see the difference in the situations worries me. It is either willful disregard for the truth or an inability to analyze by evaluating the deeper details. Dead kids are not all the same. And it does not make me happy to say this.
The Middle Eastern policy of the United States does NOT rest solely with Israel. Get that through your head and then maybe you will gain some sort of understanding. Israel is an important Ally but that is all it is. We will defend Israel if they are attacked BUT Israel is NOT a state of this Union. Get it?
No it doesn't. We have no information that she was a civilian and not a reservist or police officer. We don't know. We do know however that the reports you offered are quite specific about the law.
On the other hand, it is quite possible that if she had the training she as a civilian could have carried for the day, a state-issued firearm that she would have to return when she went home since the law is very specific about who can and cannot keep firearms at home.
Someone on another thread posted a nice graphic illustrating the situation. It had four items:
Palistinian soldier shooting rightward |
baby carriage |
Israeli soldier shooting leftward |
baby carriage |
Like Bush? You hate him. You are working as hard as you can to destroy the man and his chances in 2004 as well as the chances to get the Senate. Remember now, Bush is the reason they are shooting in the Middle East. Bush is a hypocrit and you are deemed to be the one to tell the world. No facts - but you know.
Whatever your reason - it is based on hate. Why would you have to attack Bush? I don't hear you attacking Arafat - he sits there with the U.N., the democrats and even some here ignoring him. Instead Bush is at fault. This is exactly why we should never have done anything in the M.E. - the democrats are going to pin the blame on Bush however it goes. No president has ever settled the mess over there - but that doesn't matter. They intend to use it because, you see, it is always easier to use hindsight to judge. It is easy to blame - same as you are doing.
Be proud of yourself - you are working as a liberal and a democrat. Hope one day you will help us keep this country out of the hands of those who would take away our liberty and bring in socialism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.