Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom
Evolution is a theory, meaning that it can be used to make testable hypotheses. So far, these hypotheses have stood up to repeated experimentation.

Okay, what experimentation have they stood up to? Can you give some examples for discussion?

195 posted on 03/27/2002 4:23:12 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
Okay, what experimentation have they stood up to? Can you give some examples for discussion?

Check comment 136, and we'll go through the list.

245 posted on 03/27/2002 11:36:47 PM PST by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: gore3000
Okay, what experimentation have they stood up to? Can you give some examples for discussion?

Knowing the evolutionary relationships between various organism, I would predict that "my protein"--that is, the one I have studied for the last few years--would be most similar between rats and mice, less similar between mice and humans, very much less similar between mice and fish, and quite different between mice and fruit flies. Experimental evidence confirms that this is, indeed, the case. "My protein" has certain areas necessary for its function, and other areas important for its structure. Since structure is more flexible than function, I would predict that most of the differences seen across species are located within structurally important areas, not functionally important areas. Again, experimentation has confirmed that this is the case.

822 posted on 04/01/2002 10:40:58 PM PST by exDemMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson