[steve-b]

it gives credit to "intelligent design" theory as scientifically credible

Well, then, it's worthless -- "intelligent design" fails the key criterion of falisfiability.

[Bonaparte]

"intelligent design" fails the key criterion of falsifiability.

Does it?

Start at paragraph 8.

[gore3000]

"Well, then, it's worthless -- "intelligent design" fails the key criterion of falisfiability.

Absolutely wrong. Intelligent design can be falsified. All you have to do is prove how different genes, how different organs, how different faculties coevolved at the same time. Of course, the theory of evolution has no answer to those scientific questions so it tries to silence the criticism. What the evolutionists need to do is to start work on a new theory, the theory of coevolution to replace the already discredited theory of evolution.

[RustyLimbaughFan]

"Well, then, it's worthless -- "intelligent design" fails the key criterion of falisfiability." Actually it's evolution and the theory of Abiogenesis which are not falsifiable.

[Exnihilo]

"intelligent design" fails the key criterion of falisfiability.

So does materialist evolution. But you already knew that.