Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
" No wait, you claim you've "proven evolution to be false" when arguing with what can only be considered evolution's third string"

Oh my Junior, insulting your friend! You guys must be getting really desperate!

Back to the facts. Do you have a better explanation than your friend 'the third stringer' for different systems "evolving" at the same time by random mutation? Perhaps you could find an answer from a 'first stringer' in your list-o-links.

787 posted on 03/20/2002 4:32:22 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
In evolution it's called a feedback loop -- a prime example would be brain size and manual utility (using one's hands).
788 posted on 03/20/2002 4:35:18 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies ]

To: gore3000
" No wait, you claim you've "proven evolution to be false" when arguing with what can only be considered evolution's third string"

Oh my Junior, insulting your friend! You guys must be getting really desperate!

These guys would be third-stringers at best in anything, not just evolutionism, and in the case of evolutionism, it doesn't get any beter going to the second and first string. Guys like Wendell Bird, Alexander Mebane, or Behe would make monkeys out of the Goulds and Eldredges of the world in any sort of a neutral court and I fully expect something like that, a second Scopes trial in America, to happen within the next two years. When it does, the day of public funding for evolution will be over.

797 posted on 03/20/2002 6:52:00 AM PST by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 787 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson