Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
"gore3000 has said that, for all the fossil record shows, dinosaurs might have had mammary glands. Indeed, for all that ID/creationism says, they might have. Evolution, which has real information content, tells us that they did not.

So what is the proof that Dinosaurs did not have mammary glands? What is the proof they did not have warm blood? What is the proof they did not have intelligence greater than mankind? Where is the proof Vade? Heck, you have been discussing a dinosaur that had feathers. None of your phony evo scientism would have predicted that. None of your phony evo scientism would have predicted that the platypus lay eggs. None of your phony evo scientism would have predicted that a bat would have a better sonar system than the US Navy.

771 posted on 03/19/2002 7:10:27 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
So what is the proof that Dinosaurs did not have mammary glands?

No. What is the reasoning. And I asked you first. I'm fully aware that ID would have nothing to say on the subject.

You attack evolution in your posts, but you make rather a point of being abysmally ignorant of same. If I'm tallhappying tallhappy these days, I might as well tallhappy you.

What does evolution say about the possibility of teats on a dinosaur and why does it say it? After all, you know that what it says is wrong, so you must know what it says and why it says it.

801 posted on 03/20/2002 7:07:55 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson