Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan; junior
Me: "Now as for the so-called irreducible systems like the eye and the flagella, if evolution had an explanation for those, would you then abandon ID?"

You: I've probably heard it before. But feel free to post a link.

Junior has all those links at his fingertips. Perhaps he'll take the time to give them to you. However, you really didn't answer the question, which I now repeat: "... if evolution had an explanation for those, would you then abandon ID?"

705 posted on 03/19/2002 10:33:55 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
"... if evolution had an explanation for those, would you then abandon ID?"

It would certainly affect my opinion. I don't know whether it would be decisive. Like everyone else, my judgement is based on my assessment of all of the evidence that I have seen. As in the case of the woodpecker, I usually find the ID or Creationist explanation to better conform to the evidence.

707 posted on 03/19/2002 10:37:48 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson