Uh, as opposed to ... animals?
Ok. Let's take squirrels. Are flying squirrels less fit? What about the time when they just started to develop their skin flaps? Were they less fit than squirrels that didn't have the flaps yet?
btw, are you taking back your claim that I contradicted myself? See 645.
gore3000 never admits when he is wrong. Ask VadeRetro about that one.
Don't see any reason to. You were saying both that evolution happens in secluded isolated spots and in non-secluded spots. You were therefore positing both sides of the coin as proof of evolution. I called this doubletalk and that is what it is. Not that it is unique to you. Evolutionsists talk that way about most things. For example one of their favorites is that if two species of widely divergent lineages have the same trait, they say it is due to covergence. It they are related then they call it descent. Either way they say evolution done it. This is why evolution is total nonsense. It can only support its position by holding mutually contradictory positions. It is not a theory. It is not science. It is an ideology.