Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
No, I'm just busy laughing.

D.O.A. (Delusions of Adequacy)

What is the barrier that prevents "microevolutionary" changes from accumulating indefinitely to "macroevolutionary" in reproductively isolated populations? (Note that an arbitrary distinction cannot function as a real-world barrrier.)

684 posted on 03/19/2002 8:29:33 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
What is the barrier that prevents "microevolutionary" changes from accumulating indefinitely to "macroevolutionary" in reproductively isolated populations?

The minor problem of the lack of fossil evidence, your example of the shell notwithstanding. The thing is, all of the fossil record should show transitional forms. Stable morphology should be a rare exception, rather than the rule.

689 posted on 03/19/2002 9:51:58 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

To: VadeRetro
You know those shells are nice. However, if you are using them to prove evolution you are sorely deluded. You see, shells are made by the organism to protect itself. They are not part of the organism. It is like trying to prove the evolution of beavers by showing their dams!
773 posted on 03/19/2002 7:36:29 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson