As I told Junior, it is the ultimate in arrogance and the ultimate in lameness to ask readers here to wade through tons of articles to find the proof you refuse to show them. If you know where the proof is, it is a simple matter of cutting and pasting for you to give it again. Why do you refuse to do so?
Where a key point depends only upon a few paragraphs or an imgage, I will quote same in-line, while providing a link in lieu of a footnote. There are cases in which it is the whole article, perhaps the mere existence of same, which is the refutation of some contention. I would not dream of blasting The TalkOrigins Compilation of Vertebrate Transitional Fossils in-line, for instance. There are far too many of those bad boys, and all I'm answering is the stock dumb-dumbism that not one such thing has ever existed.
Nobody but you does that silly "Post it here" nonsense.