A typical example of Reep dissecting one of my posts in detail may be seen here starting around post 203. It begins with this same sort of bellicose claim to have destroyed my case a year earlier, and ends up with Reep's position shattered, his source exposed as a total ignoramus, and Reep inviting lurkers to view a talk.origins smear sheet describing me as a kook or something and crying "Well, I may be full of $#!T, but it doesn't matter cause the other guy's an A$$#OLE!!"
You thoght I would have forgotten about that after a couple of days, Reep?
I told you that I'd answered your same exact post a year ago. I had.
I never at either time claimed that I was addressing your albedo argument, which is only one linchpin of medvedian Velikovskianism. Your standard spam post puts the albedo argument in exactly that context, the support for planetary ping-pong.
That's what I attacked as false and ridiculous. That's what I said I attacked.
Your claim to understand that I was advertising a destruction of your albedo argument looks from here like a distraction. I was calling you on your spamming, as I did again in 308 of this thread after your 303.