You stupid, stupid boy. Have you not gleaned one thing from these discussions (you haven't, as is readily apparent). Okay, I'll type s-l-o-w-l-y so you can understand it. There WAS NO TRANSFER OF GENES FROM EUGLENA TO MAN. Both received that particular gene from a common ancestor that lived a V-E-R-Y long time ago. Are you completely incapable of comprehending even simple evolutionary concepts? If so, why do you consider yourself able to refute the theory? All you refute are a few strawmen that you toss up (the Java Man thingy comes to mind).
I am asking exactly what is the ancestor of both Euglena and man. Where did Euglena get the eye-spot? Where did man get it? You cannot answer it so you insult. A theory cannot prove itself and that is what you are proposing. Sorry, I am not an ideologue like you, I require facts, I require evidence. You do not have them, you do not have the vaguest idea of what the evidence is. You are just trying to brazen it out with insults and sophistry.