Continuing in the evolutionist's mode, I suppose the model states that there was yet an earlier branching, again one which may be unsupported in the fossil record, at which point the dinos, suddenly and conveniently equipped with the necessary dino genes, forked away from something earlier, and so on, working back all the way to the un-Godly ooze from which the theory claims we all arose. So in the evolution model, it's "fork, fork, fork, all the way down." Rather like turtles, no?
Is there an reason so far to think mammary glands arose more than once in the history of life?
What do you make of the occasional whale born with legs? Where did those genes come from?
You have a certain flair, quite unlike your creationist bretheren. Don't let VadeRetro beat up on you too much, you're much more fun than our other opposition.