Replies

The only thing I left out was "in random, meaningless evolutionist terms." "Without the clear guidance of scripture" was the gist of the comment, though, as perusing his original posting indicated. I basically took an ad hominem attack against evolutionists and turned it on its head, though you never notice when creationists take pot shots at folks.

If you carefully look at the original post Vade wrote that initiated the misreprestation chain, you'll see why it attracted my attention. I'm sorry you got in the line of fire, but your post was a big misrepresentation of what was meant.

If you carefully look at the original post Vade wrote that initiated the misreprestation chain, you'll see why it attracted my attention.

Ah! You want too much for the nature of my hint-dropping. You're too used to being mystical. Even I didn't get your typically veiled and murky point. Can you help yourself?

Tribune7 needed help getting off of the "Dino = reptile / Reptiles don't have teats" thing. The evolutionary logic is more complicated, but he didn't have his evo hat on. I had to clutter his radar a bit to get him out of the rut. There are facts to consider which he simply was leaving out. Yes, the clues were selective. It's a game.

I won't leave him beguiled forever. Besides, I laid it out much straighter for No-Kin and anyone else reading the thread. There is still no response.

Consider your smoke-and-mirrors. Do you intend the confusion you sow to be temporary or permanent?