Three of your buddies have flunked this so far. It comes from a statement that gore3000 made to me, that for all we know, dinosaurs had mammary glands.
ID would indeed be mute on the subject. The Designer must not be second-guessed.
Evolution says no. It doesn't, as gore claimed to understand, "prove" it's impossible for Mrs. T-rex to be zaftig, but there's a line of evolutionary reasoning that it didn't happen.
What is that line of evolutionary reasoning? You may use any of the following and anything else you wish:
1) Reptiles have no mammary glands.
2) Mammals have mammary glands.
3) Mammals arose from a line of reptiles.
4) Birds arose from a line of reptiles.
5) Birds have no mammary glands.
I'm pulling for you, No-Kin. It would be an embarrassment to gore, if that's possible.
Hey, I'm with the Darwinists on this one. Dinosaurs with jugs? As you say, it's contrary to evolution (I'm not certain of your reasoning, but I can go with it). It would also seem odd from a creationist point of view. We don't see humans laying eggs, do we?
A total lie Vade and you know it. Read below:
I can't tell you how this sounds this far along on this thread. gore3000 told me a long time ago that, for all you can tell from a fossil, there were mammary glands on dinosaurs."
1788 posted on 3/25/02 4:41 AM Pacific by VadeRetro
It seems whenever I am not around you delight in lying and misrepresenting what I said to others. It seems you are too much of a coward and too dishonest to debate the facts. Even your buddy Junior called you a third stringer for evolution. Personally, I think that was undeserved praise.