Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Evolution says that mammals arose from reptiles. . . And yet no one reasonably versed in the evolutionary story would happily accept the possibility of mammaries on Mrs. T-rex.

Of course. If evolution is true then an event forbidden by evolution could not occur. But whether macro-evolution occurs or not is what we are considering. If there were T-Rex eggs, I would pretty much figure on no mammaries regardless of evolutionary theory.

1,839 posted on 03/25/2002 10:04:05 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1820 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
If there were T-Rex eggs, I would pretty much figure on no mammaries regardless of evolutionary theory.

Why?

1,841 posted on 03/25/2002 10:09:50 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1839 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
If there were T-Rex eggs, I would pretty much figure on no mammaries regardless of evolutionary theory.

There are platypus eggs. Should a platypus have mammary glands?

Hint: gore3000 says the platypus doesn't fit on the evolutionary tree. He's not the one to ask. It does.

1,856 posted on 03/25/2002 10:35:29 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1839 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
If there were T-Rex eggs, I would pretty much figure on no mammaries regardless of evolutionary theory.

REMEMBER THE PLATYPUS!

1,963 posted on 03/25/2002 8:55:20 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1839 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson