Yes, I'm the one proclaiming teeth posing as full creatures, a replica posing as the real thing, Mesonychus posing as a whale etc. etc
There is no religious horror to posing the true Darwinian logic evidenced in Kipling's Just So stories, it is just not rational to do so.
You don't have to recapitulate the whole year's lawyerly accomplishments. (". . . Then, five threads later, I noticed that an alleged picture of a skull was a picture of a replica of a skull!") This isn't your annual review.
There is no religious horror to posing the true Darwinian logic evidenced in Kipling's Just So stories, it is just not rational to do so.
There's no way to excuse what's going on as a mere rejection of an argument. The situation would not have the stated asymmetry if you were correct.