Considering morphologically H. Erectus shades into H. Sapiens over this time period, and Vade has already shown you skulls from this time frame, and has also explained to you the nomenclature surrounding Homo Sapiens Sapiens and Archaic Homo Sapiens. Your inability to grasp even simple concepts does not speak well for your ability to grasp something as involved as the theory of evolution. Which lends credence to our theory as to why you cannot answer Vade's question dealing with teats on dinosaurs -- you really don't have any idea of that which you speak in regards to the theory of evolution.
If it did, he would have been able to show the bones properly classified as such. He has given quite a few excuses not to do so, you are providing one more excuse. However, neither one of you has given the proof. And no, your Java Man which suddenly morphed into a homo erectus dated some 200,000 years more recently thanks to some animal bones found near the site decades later does not count.