[Doctor Stochastic]

In your post 1652 all you said is that the acquisition of a new gene is the test for macro-evolution. You haven't shown that new genes cannot be acquired.

[gore3000]

" You haven't shown that new genes cannot be acquired. "

Not in that post, no. The sole purpose of that post is/was to show what a proof of macro-evolution would be and to show why the definition was reasonable. I was not trying to debate the possibility of macro-evolution. In fact, what I was doing was setting a challenge to evolutionists to show some proof of macro-evolution.