[gore3000]

What is your source for this statement?

The source is in post#1651 (or should I repost it again since perhaps you will deny that I ever posted if I just give you a post#). However, it is very dishonest of you to ask for this proof since you know quite well that science has been saying for decades that man and apes have a common ancestor not that man descended from monkeys as the charlatan Darwin said.

[VadeRetro]

The source is in post#1651 (or should I repost it again since perhaps you will deny that I ever posted if I just give you a post#).

"Evolutionists" (i.e, mainstream science) say that apes diverged from monkeys something like 30 million years ago. Don't make me look it up.

"Evolutionists" say that the ancestor of that "common ancestor of extant apes and humans" was on the "ape" side of that divide.

Any way you look at it, "evolutionists say" that your ancestry comes down through the apes. If that bugs you, at one time rather earlier it was primitive chordates.

[oldcats]

I have been watching these posts since the beginning, and the common thread has been...evolutionists, prove your theory..prove that his happened, prove that that happened.
Well I would like to ask something of the creationist...how about proving YOUR theory, using something other that Because the Bible tells me so
You all are so fond of knocking science, yet without scientists, you wouldn't have this forum.
So once more, lay your cards on the table...where is one shred of scientific FACT that supports your theory?
Oldcats

[Virginia-American]

...charlatan Darwin ...

Charlatan? Did Darwin habitually quote people out of context? Did he lie (ie try to deceive, as opposed to merely being mistaken?) Did he call other people liars and frauds? Did he make up evidence?

This habitual name calling tells me that you know you're wrong.