Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC; gore3000
Part of the History of the Identification of Notharctus as a Primate (and thus a mammal).
1,701 posted on 03/24/2002 12:19:24 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1699 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
The following quote is from the notes to the article:

4) One reason for the multitude of names given to Notharctus was the frantic naming competition between O.C. Marsh and E. D. Cope. Another, however is the fragmentary nature of the fossils themselves. They commonly consisted of isolated teeth or small jaw fragments. Indeed, Leidy himself identified several other primate teeth and bone fragments as belonging to insectivores (the group of primative mammals most closely to primates) or to "pachyderms".

It should also be noted that the only bones shown in the article are a lower jaw of Notharcus (or rather reputed to belong to Notharcus) from a lithograph.

1,745 posted on 03/24/2002 3:13:08 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1701 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson