[VadeRetro]

Has science disproven or not disproven that humans came from apes? Showing a range of values in the literature for the time of divergence does nothing to help your point. An uncertainty in the divergence date is not a disproof that the common ancestor was an ape. What is the source for your bizarre claim? You spew this stuff and then run rather than defend.

What is the source for the following interesting quote?

BTW - evos were trying to pass off the hippo as the ancestor of the whale, but they ran into a little trouble - DNA. The DNA proved conclusively that whales did not descend from hippos.

From here.

The same claim was repeated later:

BTW - this discussion is of course purely for amusement since DNA evidence has already shown that whales are not related to hippos as evolutionists have claimed using "evidence" similar to the one presented by you and other evolutionists in this discussion.

That was here, to me.

I noticed here that you were simply ignoring further questions.

You've had funny blinders on ever since.

You have been asked for a source of your claim that science has eliminated apes as an ancestor of humans. Your links do not help you with this at all.

[gore3000]

Has science disproven or not disproven that humans came from apes?

YES SCIENCE HAS DISPROVEN THAT HUMANS CAM FROM APES AND THE PROOF IS IN THE POST YOU JUST ANSWERED.

Oh and whales have nothing to do with it except that when you are proven wrong all you know how to do is lie and insult.