[VadeRetro]

Provide a two or three sentence outline of what you think the evidence is. And remember evidence isn't proof.

Alas! The topic list of the lines of evidence runs to 29 items. There's too much evidence to describe as simplistically as you'd like.

[Tribune7]

Alas! The topic list of the lines of evidence runs to 29 items. There's too much evidence to describe as simplistically as you'd like.

Well, you could provide the top two or three. You're not suggesting that you have to read the entire link provided to come to a conclusive as to the plausibility of macro-evolution are you?

I scanned the link and saw a few arguments with which I was familiar but nothing that seemed to indicate a slam-dunk debate ender.

I'm not "anti-evolution" in the sense that if evolution should be determined to be true my sensibilities would be offended. I just think we'd be better off treating it with some detached skepticism.

[gore3000]

Alas! The topic list of the lines of evidence runs to 29 items. There's too much evidence to describe as simplistically as you'd like.

I saw some of those "29 evidences" on these threads and the ones I saw were utterly laughable. You pick the strongest one. Let's discuss it right here. Let's see you show us what the great proof of macro-evolution is.