[VadeRetro]

Like I said you have no proof. You are using circular reasoning. You say since evolution is true, and evolution says dinosaurs did not have mammary glands therefore dinosaurs did not have mammary glands.

I have not read one source that addresses the question of mammaries on dinos. For all that, I know what evolution must certainly say on the subject. I reason this by applying the model. The answer has to be: No mamms on a dino.

Again, how am I doing this and where does ID offer anything comparable?

Let me know if you give up, but anyone who claims to know enough about evolution to reject it should at least be able to reproduce the reasoning I use but have not stated. (Although I've certainly given you some big hints. Anyone could read the thread and get it if they didn't know.)

[gore3000]

I have not read one source that addresses the question of mammaries on dinos.

Fine, after many posts I finally got the admission that there is no proof at all of whether dinos had or did not have mammaries. All that there is is circular reasoning from the non-science of paleontology.