[edsheppa]

...who can say what Bill Clinton did was wrong. I mean, Monica vs. Hillary?

Hardly a scientific question, eh? Certainly you agree that in the realm of science the assumption of naturalism has been very fruitful? It seems to me that supernaturalism will have to establish a similar track record to displace it.

[Heartlander]

No, it was not a scientific question, but you asked a philosophical question and I responded the favor. To debate an evolutionist who does not believe in ID on a philosophical level – well, they really have no solid ground to stand on.

Example (pertaining to this discussion):
If everything was created by nature without Intelligent Design – If man was created by nature and acts only through nature – Nothing man creates has Intelligent Design because it is natural.

If man does have Intelligence and it was given to him by nature – nature must have Intelligence built into it – Since nature created everything – What is nature?