Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: longshadow
Since you (and others here) wish to pollute this thread with irrelevancies, here it is:

Supreme Court Decisions var yviContents='http://us.toto.geo.yahoo.com/toto?s=76001084&l=NE&b=1&t=993785023'; yviR='us';yfiEA(0);

When completed, this page will contain all relevant supreme court decisions banishing creation "science" from public school science classes.

Edwards vs. Aguillard The U.S. supreme court in 1987 ruled unconstitutional a 1981 Louisiana "balanced treatment" law requiring the teaching of creation "science" in public schools whenever evolution is taught.

McLean vs. Arkansas U.S. District Court Judge William Overton in 1982 ruled unconstitutional an Arkansas "balanced treatment" law requiring the teaching of creation "science" in public schools whenever evolution is taught.

Webster vs. New Lenox U.S. Supreme Court upholds a District Court ruling that Mr. Webster did not have a First Amendment right to teach creation science in a public school.

Epperson vs. Arkansas The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1968 that a 1929 Arkansas statute prohibiting the teaching of evolution was unconstitutional.

Peloza vs. Capistrano In 1994, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court finding that a teacher's First Amendment right to free exercise of religion is not violated by a school district's requirement that evolution be taught in biology classes.

Segraves vs. California In 1981, the Court found that the California State Board of Education's Science Framework, as written and as qualified by its anti-dogmatism policy, gave sufficient accommodation to the views of Segraves, contrary to his contention that class discussion of evolution prohibited his and his childrem's free exercise of religion.

Return to the Fire Page


1,230 posted on 03/21/2002 9:32:09 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1218 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000; longshadow
This goes back many months. Contrary to your original claim, none of those cases mandates the teaching of evolution. Not one.
1,237 posted on 03/22/2002 2:50:51 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1230 | View Replies ]

To: gore3000
But none of those rulings forced the teaching of evolution, they simply removed creationism from science class. The two results are not synonymous. You have still not shown a case where a school was forced to teach evolution as you claimed earlier.
1,246 posted on 03/22/2002 5:14:43 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson