Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Actually, BMCDA's post I linked back for you earlier did have some nice pictures of the salamanders in the California ring species example.

They are not a new genus, they are not even a new species. From BMCDA's post to be found at #808 of this thread:

Yet the entire complex of populations belongs to a single taxonomic species, Ensatina escholtzii.

In summary, you have yet to give an example of macro-evolution on this thread. Keep trying though, maybe in another 150 years you will find one.

1,187 posted on 03/21/2002 5:50:05 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1077 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
Yet the entire complex of populations belongs to a single taxonomic species, Ensatina escholtzii.

Note that the same article says specifically that the populations where the ring rejoins meet every definition of being a separate species. More creationist quote science! You just took the one sentence you wanted.

Ostrich head-in-the-sand democrat--lawyer on the words
Think wonderful thoughts--reality will go away
Own definitions making up--Help f.Christian I'm no good at this!

1,190 posted on 03/21/2002 6:05:32 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson