Oh, I see, you are not a liar, you were just indulging in semantic sophistry. You were just trying to make people think you had proof when you had none. I guess that's what you call honest discussion.
So therefore my statement that you have no proof of dinosaurs having mammary glands is correct. My statement that paleontology does not know from beans is correct also. My statement that fossil do not prove evolution is also correct.
I have stated that reasoning from an evolutionary framework says that dinosaurs did not have mammary glands. If you're curious, all you have to do is give up. If you can reproduce the evolutionary reasoning, all you have to do is do so. I promise not to say, "That's not it" if you get it right. We both know that ID has nothing to say on the subject one way or the other.
Why do you pretend not to see questions? You freqently seek to impose conclusions upon evolutionary theory that it does not make for itself. Why not show that your arguments are well-founded because you understand what you are rejecting?
All you have to do to end this is 1) give up or 2) provide the evolutionary reasoning why there were no teats on a dinosaur, ever. I've certainly asked you enough times to do one or the other.