[VadeRetro]

Here's the Thread I Mentioned. Read the main article first. Skip over the "God hates Idiots" spam.

Skip 55. I never know what I'm talking about and everyone knows there are no transitional insect fossils.

Karl_Lembke's 57 exposes Wells pantless in public.

You might also want to read some less-fawning reviews of Icons, compiled here.

[gore3000]

You have not yet learned how to copy and paste have you? You seem to think this thread is a private discussion between yourself and whoever you are responding to. This is a public discussion and you owe the readers of this thread to do the work yourself of proving what you are trying to prove. It is common courtesy if nothing else.

[AndrewC]

Karl_Lembke's 57 exposes Wells pantless in public.

The pantless Wells responds with a full "moon".

MUTANT SHRIMP? - A Correction

Gishlick and other defenders of Darwinian evolution should take no comfort from my mistake. In light of the UCSD researchers’ actual results, their claim to have discovered a "general mechanism for producing major leaps in evolutionary change" is even more exaggerated than I originally thought.

"Shrimp is the fruit of the sea. You kin barbecue it, boil it, broil it, bake it, sauté it, - but you cain't turn it into a fruit fly."

- with apologies to Bubba in "Forrest Gump"