[gore3000]

In post#680 you said:

"gore3000 has said that, for all the fossil record shows, dinosaurs might have had mammary glands. Indeed, for all that ID/creationism says, they might have. Evolution, which has real information content, tells us that they did not.

I asked you to back it up several times, you have yet to do so. Give the proof and stop the nonsense. You cannot give proof so you evade and try to make me the issue.

[VadeRetro]

I asked you to back it up several times, you have yet to do so. Give the proof and stop the nonsense. You cannot give proof so you evade and try to make me the issue.

Was even the "big, big" hint in my previous post wasted on you?

You should be an expert on evolutionary theory by now. Why would it be a dismaying, flabbergasting event to find evidence of mammary glands in dinosaurs?

I will tell you if you say, "OK, I give up."

But think about what it means for a 1-year anti-evolutionary veteran of these threads to admit he's clueless about how to apply the evolutionary model.