Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Common Creationist Arguments - Pseudoscience
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Creationism/Arguments/Pseudoscience.shtml ^

Posted on 03/13/2002 4:47:26 AM PST by JediGirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 2,461-2,474 next last
To: Buck Turgidson
we evolutionists are covering up the rotten core of our edifice

Yagh, hah, hah, hah, hah, hagh! You quoted Gould, and he gave the game away! The quote is there! The quote is there! < /G3Kcreationist mode>

421 posted on 03/15/2002 5:53:40 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Scully; medved; Junior
From Chapter 7 - Impact Craters:

Impact craters are found on both the plains and the highlands of Venus. Schaber et al. [1992] found the spatial distribution of craters to be highly uniform with a size-frequency distribution lower than those of the other terrestrial planets (except that of Earth), indicating a relatively young age of 0.5 Ga. The number of small craters is much smaller than that on other planets because of atmospheric filtering. One theory holds that the majority of Venusian craters appears pristine because the planet was resurfaced 0.5 Ga ago and there has been very little geologic activity and weathering since to degrade and destroy the craters [Schaber et al., 1992]. Phillips et al. [1992] found that the crater size-frequency distributions, locations, and preservation states implied a range of surface ages.
I was wrong to assume old craters from 4 billion years ago. Apparently, half a gigayear is about it. Still, that's pretty old for what we're talking about.
422 posted on 03/15/2002 6:04:01 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Today, astronomers can peacefully discuss their ideas, generally free of strident opponents.

You do ignore Medved's posts, don't you?

423 posted on 03/15/2002 6:11:51 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Thanks for the post. It has a bit more information than my post! LOL!!
424 posted on 03/15/2002 6:17:32 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Scully; kinsman redeemer; Kyrie; beckett
Back in the 1630s, a forum like this (had it existed) discussing the solar system would have been just as rancorous.

Back in the 1630's, it wouldn't have been any more of a forum than this is, I think. To me, "forum" implies a place where we listen and are heard, where we speak and are spoken to. This is more reminiscent of the Hatfields and McCoys. Bang! Bang!

It doesn't seem to matter what the ostensible topic is, the posts and arguments are virtually identical from thread to thread. No refutation will suffice, no argument is strong enough, no one even appears to moderate their positions. Every crevo thread is a fresh start, a new dawn, and it is as though no crevo thread has ever come before. It just seems silly to start every thread tabula rasa, with a blank slate.

I'm desperately trying to avoid indicting one side or the other - I have an opinion of my own, of course, and it should be fairly clear where my sympathies lie to anyone who cares to dig up my posts. But it just seems as though there's so much heat, and so little light. I cannot help but wonder if we don't spend more time and energy on this than it is really worth - the truth of the matter will out eventually, no matter what any of us say or do here.

And, if I may, there is so much out there in the world that we can change, that we can affect. We argue about the truth of evolution or of creation, while those arrayed against us all politically set their differences aside long enough to gain power. Because, after all, they know that there's little point in dividing a pot you haven't won yet. They know very well that they will have all the time in the world to hash out their internal differences after they have gained the brass ring.

We are, all of us, as one flavor of conservative or another, a minority in this country. Maybe we always have been - certainly for the last 70 years, anyway. I'd like to think that this fact is slowly changing, that the tide is shifting in our favor, but our political fortunes are now as they always have been - a matter of our own will and determination. And right now, what we are is outsiders looking in, and squabbling about who will hold the keys once we seize the kingdom.

But my point is simple - it doesn't matter, as long as we are outside looking in. We need a coherent sense of who we are, a coherent sense of what we can do, a coherent sense of us. Because they've got the numbers on us - they can afford to take some time out occasionally to fight amongst themselves. We can't. Hell, with Billy Jeff in power, we had a purpose, a mission. And now I fear that after we have clawed our way up from the muck by a single inch, we're getting fat and sassy and forgetting that, right now, in some smoky room somewhere, someone is plotting to depose us and erase what little we have gained since December of 2000, and what little we will gain in the coming months.

Do I think the crevo_list should really be retired? No. It serves a purpose - if not for the posters who are too battle-hardened and scarred now to ever change sides, it still serves for those lurking who haven't made up their minds about such things, or who are curious and wish to know more. I just wish that half the energy I see on these threads was directed to something that we all could really have a real, concrete impact upon. To make real changes, that we all can really affect. To spread ideas about how this nation should be to those who sit in darkness, because darkness is all they have ever known.

We have real work to do - do not think the election of GWB is the end. Let's make it a beginning. Let's split our gains amongst ourselves after we actually have them.

Come home, boys - this war is over, and a new one begins. Who's with me?

425 posted on 03/15/2002 6:55:08 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Every geologist I know prefers to say "billion years ago" or "billion years before present" for the abbreviation "Ga".

I know, I know, splitting hairs, you are technically correct...nevertheless... ;)

426 posted on 03/15/2002 6:56:56 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Only a "bit" of information more...you had the opportunity though of actually rubbing elbows with these folks while making a major contribution to science yourself through the space program. Thank you! :)
427 posted on 03/15/2002 6:59:50 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Scully
you have freep mail
428 posted on 03/15/2002 7:00:23 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Come home, boys - this war is over, and a new one begins. Who's with me?

Well, if you include us girls, I'm with you! :)

You are absolutely correct. We have far better things to be doing at this time, and we have gotten sidetracked with specifics when we should be safeguarding our ability and right to disagree within these hallowed cyberhalls.

Thank you for your extremely eloquent posts.

429 posted on 03/15/2002 7:07:21 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Although very well said, there are more than a few individuals on this thread who just like to argue.
430 posted on 03/15/2002 7:18:22 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Oh, I don't have a problem with that - I've been known to play devil's advocate just for the sake of provocation from time to time. I just wish I could puzzle out some sense of progress, as though all this was ultimately leading somewhere. Obviously, a consensus is going to be next to impossible, but just finding something new to fight about would be sort of refreshing at this point ;)
431 posted on 03/15/2002 7:25:10 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: general_re
How about how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin! :)
432 posted on 03/15/2002 7:27:31 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Well, if you include us girls, I'm with you! :)

I would be a fool otherwise. Maybe you all can help keep some of the testosterone in check when the crevo threads start degenerating into a pissing contest ;)

433 posted on 03/15/2002 7:30:46 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: general_re
The only thing our posts really accomplish, as you pointed out, is to provide food-for-thought to newcomers to the crevo threads. Sadly, we seem to degenerate so quickly into mud and australopithicus-slinging that only the participants keep up with continued posts. Sad, very sad.
434 posted on 03/15/2002 7:33:41 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
How about how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin!

You, tied to the material as you undoubtedly are, would surely argue for some finite number. Well, any fool can see that the only correct answer is "all of them" or "as many as you like".

Well, then, "Mr. Finite", answer me this - just how much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Huh? Huh?

Just as I thought - I have you wriggling like a bug in the crushing grip of my logic! A BUG! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

;)

435 posted on 03/15/2002 7:40:16 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: general_re
how much wood would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Hmmmm. Need my slide rule for this one. :)

436 posted on 03/15/2002 7:44:19 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: general_re
help keep some of the testosterone in check

Actually, testosterone isn't such a bad thing. Merely another evolutionary advancement. ;)

437 posted on 03/15/2002 7:48:28 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Sadly, we seem to degenerate so quickly into mud and australopithicus-slinging that only the participants keep up with continued posts. Sad, very sad.

Maybe for you, but it tells me just how far down the path to ignorance we have come!

438 posted on 03/15/2002 7:49:32 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: general_re
You, tied to the material as you undoubtedly are

Now that sounds like fun!

439 posted on 03/15/2002 7:51:30 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Need my slide rule for this one. :)

Your dating yourself. (even better than C-14)

440 posted on 03/15/2002 7:52:43 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 2,461-2,474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson