[ArGee]

What you are saying here is Biology is invalid. I don't accept that. The scientific method of verification is all I will accept, nothing less.

I am sorry that you are limiting yourself so completely. I did not say that biology is invalid. I said that it had to recognize that beings are not subject solely to physical laws.

G-d is not a repeatable experiment. But then, how many times do you have to destroy the first-born of Egypt for people to get the message?

I will pray for you, but I believe you and I have danced all of the dance and gotten nowhere. But if you think otherwise, post away.

Shalom.

[LuvItOrLeaveIt]

G-d is not a repeatable experiment. But then, how many times do you have to destroy the first-born of Egypt for people to get the message?

The only place I've ever seen a claim of that was in a book that is no different than The Iliad. Do you have some independently verifiable evidence to back up this claim about your alleged god killing the firstborn of a nation? OOOPS! I forgot, you first must present that independently verifiable evidence that this alleged god exists before you can convince me of the second condition.

[Celtjew Libertarian]

The ultimate contradiction of living by the scientific method only. How can you logically prove that anything non-verifiable exists within a system that requires verification?

Especially from someone who rejects the evidence of the senses without verification.

[Jeff Gordon]

how many times do you have to destroy the first-born of Egypt for people to get the message?

Once, just once more, under the watchful eyes of the cameras of CNN would do just fine.