To: OWK; RaceBannon
Whose definition of "loving" will win out, OWK's (based totally on an extremely limited understanding of all the factors involved) or God's (based on a total and perfect understanding of everything)? Hmmmmmm. Tough choice . . . .
To: savedbygrace
Whose definition of "loving" will win out, OWK's (based totally on an extremely limited understanding of all the factors involved) or God's (based on a total and perfect understanding of everything)? Hmmmmmm. Tough choice . . . . I see...
So the word "loving" must be redefined to accomodate the sadistic and tyranical actions attributed to God in the Old testament....
Maybe.... just maybe... those who scribed the Old Testament attributed some pretty nasty things to God which were really not so, and love really doesn't need to be redefined after all.
367 posted on
01/03/2002 6:53:08 PM PST by
OWK
To: savedbygrace;OWK
Whose definition of "loving" will win out, OWK's (based totally on an extremely limited understanding of all the factors involved) or God's (based on a total and perfect understanding of everything)? Hmmmmmm. Tough choice . . . .
Since OWK appears to be real, and there is no indication the same is true for any god, I'd say OWK.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson