Posted on 02/06/2026 12:46:51 PM PST by ebb tide
Defense lawyers have told the Vatican appeals tribunal that “secret decrees” issued by Pope Francis unlawfully expanded prosecutorial powers and undermined the fundamental rights of defendants in Cardinal Angelo Becciu’s trial.
On Tuesday, during the resumption of the appeals phase of the Vatican’s so-called trial of the century, defense attorneys for Becciu and eight co-defendants argued before the Vatican City State Tribunal that four confidential decrees signed by Pope Francis in 2019 and 2020 violated basic principles of due process by granting prosecutors extraordinary investigative powers that departed from existing law and were never officially published.
“The failure to publish these provisions risks making the Vatican’s procedural code fascist,” defense lawyer Mario Zanchetti told the tribunal, arguing that the secret decrees would render the entire trial invalid.
READ: Liturgy expert suggests SSPX consecrations influenced by Vatican document on Mary’s titles
The decrees were confidential orders personally signed by Pope Francis, which gave Vatican prosecutors special powers to investigate and allowed actions that normally wouldn’t be permitted under Vatican law. In particular, the decrees authorized Vatican prosecutors to employ wide-ranging surveillance tools, including wiretaps, and to deviate from established procedural norms without judicial oversight.
Since they are classified as confidential or secret, these decrees were never published, meaning the public and even the defendants didn’t know they existed at the time.
Attorney Luigi Panella described the measures as giving prosecutors a “surreal carte blanche” to investigate. Zanchetti argued that his client, Italian broker Gianluigi Torzi, was directly affected by the decrees. Torzi’s electronic devices were seized, and he was arrested and detained inside Vatican gendarmerie barracks for ten days without formal charges or a warrant issued by a judge.
The defense contends that such actions breached the principle of legality and the right to a fair trial, including the requirement of “equality of arms” between prosecution and defense. Legal experts have said that laws governing criminal investigations must be accessible and knowable in advance, and that secret norms applicable only to one case undermine that requirement.
The judge, Archbishop Alejandro Arellano Cedillo, intervened to ask lawyers to avoid explicitly naming the former Pope during their arguments. “I would ask you to not name Pope Francis,” Arellano said. “We all understand, if you avoid referencing the Holy Father.”
The hearing marked the most direct focus so far on Pope Francis’ personal role in authorizing investigative measures during the early stages of the Vatican’s financial review.
According to Canon law and Vatican legal tradition, Prima Sedes a nemine judicatur – “the first see is accountable to no one” – that is, a reigning Pope is accountable only to God.
While it is theoretically lawful for a Pope, as the absolute sovereign with regard to the positive law of Vatican City, to issue confidential executive decrees, using them to steer a trial in a predetermined direction would violate natural law, which forbids perverting the course of justice.
In a criminal trial, this natural duty means giving each person either the punishment the law requires or declaring their innocence, as the evidence shows. Any attempt to force the outcome would be unjust, because even the Pope is not above natural law, which belongs to divine law.
READ: Jeffrey Epstein donated ‘critical funds’ to Catholic Charities of the Virgin Islands
The judicial case erupted in 2020, when Pope Francis stripped Cardinal Becciu of the rights connected to the cardinalate after the launch of an investigation into the Secretariat of State’s controversial investment in a London property. Becciu was accused of opaque management of confidential funds, “embezzlement,” and favoritism – allegations he rejected, insisting he had always acted with the approval of his superiors.
Convicted in the first instance in 2023, he is now facing the appeals process, which calls into question both the procedure itself and the way in which Pope Francis exercised his power.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
While it is theoretically lawful for a Pope, as the absolute sovereign with regard to the positive law of Vatican City, to issue confidential executive decrees, using them to steer a trial in a predetermined direction would violate natural law, which forbids perverting the course of justice.
Becciu, Burke, Pell, Müller, Strickland, Schneider, Daniel Fernández Torres, ...traditional priestly and religious orders, etc. have all suffered the wrath of the dictator pope.
Ping
Dictator Pope ping
Becciu is a pretty sketchy character in his own right, but I tend to think Bergoglio turned him into the fall guy for his own corrupt moves. Ah... Bergoglio, God have mercy on his soul. I remember after his 2013 election there was a quote cited below. Let’s face it... he sowed the same kind of chaos on a much grander scale, 2013-2025.
“Yes I know Bergoglio [, says a Jesuit superior from another Latin American country]. He’s a person who’s caused a lot of problems in the Society and is highly controversial in his own country.
In addition to being accused of having allowed the arrest of two Jesuits during the time of the Argentinian dictatorship, as provincial he generated divided loyalties: some groups almost worshipped him, while others would have nothing to do with him, and he would hardly speak to them. It was an absurd situation. He is well-trained and very capable, but is surrounded by this personality cult which is extremely divisive. He has an aura of spirituality which he uses to obtain power. It will be a catastrophe for the Church to have someone like him in the Apostolic See. He left the Society of Jesus in Argentina destroyed with Jesuits divided and institutions destroyed and financially broken. We have spent two decades trying to fix the chaos that the man left us.”
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2015/10/repost-yes-i-know-bergoglio-hes-person.html
First posted March 13, 2013, the same day the College of Cardinals elected him Pope.
Yes, I remember reading that on Rorate on 3/13/13. I prayed that it was wrong or exaggerated. It wasn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.