[Catholic Caucus] An Open Letter to US Dioceses

The Annual Appeal was launched in our diocese this weekend, as it has been or will be in many other dioceses, with a sound-tracked video at every Mass and a step-by-step walk-through of the completion of pledge cards. While I sympathize with the committee that came up with that tedious line-by-line approach, it doesn’t wear well on adults.

Instead, maybe give us an honest accounting of where our money has gone, the steps taken to protect and report it, and a picture of the accounting best practices that assure us the money is spent as intended. Maybe that, instead of, “On the first line, write your name. We’ll wait.”

Maybe tell us about the engagement of independent auditors to oversee the implementation of proper internal controls and the production of attested financial statements. An audit is so effective a tool that when Cardinal George Pell, as Prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy, contracted with PriceWaterhouseCoopers to audit the Vatican accounts, false charges were advanced to force him back to Australia. Needless to say, the audit was cancelled, Pell was whisked away from Rome to a sham trial, and he was effectively neutralized as a financial reformer.

No substantial business with stakeholders could dream of not having an audit; it’s the only way the public can be assured that a business is doing what it says on the label. No public company can opt out of an annual audit; it’s in SEC regulations, to protect stockholders.

Why should dioceses be any different? They should be held to a higher standard not a lower, given that they act in the name of Christ. But an audit takes carte blanche away from diocesan employees who are not accustomed to outside scrutiny.

In the past, we’ve trusted the oversight of bishops and the proficiency and good intentions of chancery staff. That is no longer a prudent strategy, if it ever was. Blind trust with no accountability may actually encourage shoddy behavior.

In truth, how many bishops take personal responsibility for the funds contributed? Many have inherited a command structure in the chancery that actively precludes any possibility of personal agency. “For goodness’ sake, don’t rock the boat, Your Excellency. People won’t like you.”

So, practically speaking, we’re not even blindly trusting a bishop when we give to appeals with no transparency; we’re blindly trusting lay employees who may not be identifiable behind the protective curtain of the diocesan business office.

Here in Tyler, Texas, some of us still wonder why no one in the chancery spoke up for our bishop when he was removed without process. Presented with an appeal relying on trust for those same people, we still wonder. While that is a concern unique to Tyler, it speaks to the assumption that the faithful will blindly hand over money to people who are disconnected from the issues that most deeply concern us.

We have been given no hard information about the financial decision-making and oversight processes, just mention of the seminarians and Catholic Charities, as if that establishes the case.

In our diocese, we can contribute separately to a fund for seminarians. We can contribute separately to the college campus ministry or to the St. Vincent de Paul Society. We can, in effect, bypass the Annual Appeal without neglecting the causes we care about.

That leaves Catholic Charities. Early in 2025, it was confirmed what many of us suspected already, that Catholic Charities was facilitating human and drug trafficking at the Southern border. When an appeal is presented that benefits Catholic Charities, we immediately call to mind the 300,000+ minor children who disappeared into the interior of the country with no protection; the fentanyl highway; the fees that human smugglers demand, so high that a period of indenture (slavery) is required; and the undocumented millions of dollars that were made during the Biden invasion from sex commerce at the border.

I’m not saying the bishops are guilty, but if they ask for money, they should, by golly, address these concerns in some plausible way beyond, “We didn’t do it.”

There were huge grants to Catholic Charities from Biden’s executive agencies, over $2.3 billion during his administration. Catholic Charities of Fort Worth, alone, increased its annual revenue from $32 million to $289 million during the Biden years, with $270 million coming from the government. What would account for an 800 percent increase in funding?

The Federal pipeline has been shut off, for the most part, which means Catholic Charities will have to rely more heavily on Bishops’ Appeals. That’s all the more reason to demand an independent audit with documentation of activities and organizations supported by our dioceses.

While I have hope that our local Catholic Charities of Tyler has not participated in the income from bogus government grants or from trafficking of any kind, credible proof has not been presented to us. No one is even acknowledging that we have valid concerns. We are just supposed to sign the check (or click the “GIVE NOW” button) without solid answers.

The bishops, as a whole, are disingenuous. They have supported abortion and homosexuality through screens of obscuring organizations, especially the Campaign for Human Development—and its dependent NGOs (here, for example)—which was reinstituted in our diocese when our new bishop took office.

Bishops who provably participated in, or covered up for, clerical sex abuse are promoted by Rome, which could not happen if the USCCB oversaw its own members and had the will to protect the faithful.

Bishops gather together to moralize against the president that many of us voted for, as though the Catholic Church has become a Democrat stump, the rest of us be damned. Instead of preaching and teaching the universal Catholic truths, they concern themselves with politics and their bank accounts. They spend more time agitating against communion rails and the Latin Mass than preaching the Gospel.

They have, in nearly every way, thrown out the moral authority they should have had by ignoring Christ as though they have any authority within themselves apart from Him. And then they ask us for money and hope we will continue to give blindly. Bishops have been withdrawing moral capital for decades and not making deposits. The whole structure is broken.

Dear bishops, we are tired of the never-ending scandals and your pretending that nothing is amiss. We are tired of being used by you.

If a particular bishop is innocent, let him at least address our concerns and give us solid, documented reasons to believe he is truthful. A clean, independent audit report would be the most direct way.

Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

Here in Tyler, Texas, some of us still wonder why no one in the chancery spoke up for our bishop (Joseph Strickland) when he was removed without process. Presented with an appeal relying on trust for those same people, we still wonder. While that is a concern unique to Tyler, it speaks to the assumption that the faithful will blindly hand over money to people who are disconnected from the issues that most deeply concern us.

....

Just shut up! Bp. Strickland was my bishop when we lived in his diocese. I’m sick of your unfounded, egregious attacks on one of the few holy bishops in the Church. He is a True Shepherd who is concerned with the salvation of souls. Something you obviously know nothing about! And I’m still not convinced that you are even Catholic.

strickland was fired. And contrary to the posting above, he received what he deserved. After his firing stickland has gone about promoting himself in a false manner even to the point of giving himself the Honoria of “emeritus,” which his own old diocese does not grant him. As the above posting also notes that he was quoted at a national bishops meeting. His quote and appearance was met with a “thud” by the Bishops in good standing. This means he is not only fired but disgraced. Don’t be fooled by a fired wolf in sheep’s clothing.

I was expecting you, oystir, since you're an ardent defender of immoral, homosexualist prelates like Bergoglio's chosen little perverts, Tucho and Jimmy Martin, and all their heresies.

And like those mentioned above, you can't stand the thought of Catholic, orthodox and moral priests and bishops speaking out and preaching the true Catholic Faith.

It just irritates you so much:

Calm down, before your hemorrhoids flare up again.

Not to discount the points OP is making, bec I agree
BUT
As was told to me from a priest many years ago -
Every person in the Chancery has an agenda!

So by extension, the Bishop may not always get the best or unfiltered advise from those in the Chancery.
I’m also confident Pope Francis filled most Dioceses with less than satisfactory Bishops.

‘But who am I to judge’

You have no idea what you are talking about. You are making it all up. If you were Catholic, you would know that calumny is a Very Serious Sin. But I guess in your world, sin does not exist.

strickland was fired.

Idiot.

So was Joan of Arc, literally; and she's a saint.

So was Joan of Arc, literally; and she’s a saint.

She was a sister who really cooked.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.