The Neo-Catechumenal Way: Leo XIV Praises a Modernist Cult

How a Vatican II–Spawned “Way” Became a Web of Scandals, Heresies, and Cult-Like Abuses – and Why It Should Have Been Suppressed

The Neo-Catechumenal Way (NCW) was born in 1964 in the wake of Vatican II, founded by layman Francisco “Kiko” Argüello and Carmen Hernández. It bills itself as an “itinerary of Christian formation” for lapsed Catholics, but it resembles a sect within the conciliar Church. Even its name – “the Way” – betrays an exclusive self-concept, as if it alone were the path to true faith. Indeed, critics note that NCW members historically referred to ordinary (non-NCW) Catholics as “pagans” in their internal jargon. This shocking label makes twisted sense once one grasps Kiko’s heterodox theology: since “pagans…offer sacrifices” at Mass, any Catholic attending the traditional Eucharistic sacrifice was deemed a “pagan” by the NCW’s founders. Such arrogance (implying that all the saints, popes, and martyrs who worshipped at the traditional Mass were essentially mistaken) is a red flag that the NCW’s DNA is fundamentally opposed to Catholicism.

From its inception, the NCW cultivated a parallel Church structure. It establishes closed-off communities with their own catechists, their own liturgies, and even their own seminaries (called Redemptoris Mater seminaries) under NCW control. Far from integrating into parish life, these communities form a sort of “church within the Church,” as even modern bishops have warned. In parish after parish, the NCW’s presence has caused division and pain: members separate from “ordinary” Catholics, holding private Saturday-night services barred to the “riffraff” of the parish . Those who don’t join “the Way” are treated as outsiders in their own parishes. Is it any wonder that many pastors and bishops have denounced the NCW as sectarian and divisive? The bishops of Japan, for example, unanimously wanted to suspend the NCW for five years because its “powerful sect-like activity…caused sharp, painful division and strife within the Church.” They warned that wherever the NCW goes, “confusion, conflict, division, and chaos” follow, producing “grave…suffering in the bosom of the Church.” These are not Traditional cranks saying this, but mainstream Catholic bishops begging Rome to intervene. And yet, rather than suppress this source of chaos, the Vatican after Vatican II has continually protected and promoted the NCW; a decision utterly incomprehensible.

At the heart of the Neo-Catechumenal Way’s many scandals is its bizarre liturgy. The NCW Mass hardly resembles the reverent Catholic liturgy of the ages. It’s more akin to a Protestantized house church meeting. NCW communities celebrate a private Mass on Saturday nights (often in a hall or auditorium), with 30-50 members sitting in a circle around a table instead of kneeling at an altar. Communion is received sitting down, from an oversized loaf of unleavened bread passed around, a mode of reception explicitly corrected by the Vatican in 2005, when Cardinal Arinze ordered the NCW to “receive communion standing, not sitting.” In fact, Benedict XVI had to remind NCW members that every Eucharist must be open to all the faithful and “not separate from the parish community,” gently rebuking their habit of isolated, closed-door liturgies.

The NCW’s innovations didn’t stop at posture: for decades they omitted the Creed and the Agnus Dei from their Mass, inserted extended lay preaching (“echoes” or “resonances”) in the middle of the liturgy, and performed ritual dances around the table; all abuses which Rome feebly asked them to “correct” only long after the fact. These practices constitute a shocking profanation of the Mass. The Last Supper–style meal that NCW founder Kiko Argüello promotes is a rupture from Catholic liturgical theology; a new rite cooked up in the 1960s. As one critic wryly observed, “the Way has come up with this party‐style celebration meal around a table to replace [the traditional Mass]”, as if the rite sanctified by nearly 2,000 years of saints and popes was “hopelessly wrong.”

Heretical ideas lurk behind the NCW’s liturgical novelties. Thanks to a Vatican-mandated review of the Way’s secret catechetical texts, it came to light that Kiko and Carmen’s teachings about the Eucharist were seriously defective. In the original NCW Catechetical Directory, Carmen Hernández openly denigrated Eucharistic adoration and the Real Presence. She scoffed that if Christ intended the Eucharist to be reserved in a tabernacle, “He would have made [it] in a stone that does not go bad.” In her view, the Eucharist is “not an absolute” presence of Christ, but only “a means to lead us to an end, which is Passover.” This outrageous statement, effectively reducing Our Lord’s abiding presence in the Blessed Sacrament to a relative, temporary symbol, did not escape Vatican censure. Before “approving” the NCW’s statutes in 2008, officials quietly took a red pen to such blatant heresies in the catechist manuals. The corrected version now reads more obliquely (“the bread and wine…are essentially to be eaten and only secondarily to be exposed” ), but the core mindset remains: the NCW downplays Eucharistic adoration and the sacrificial nature of the Mass at every turn.

Is it any wonder, then, that NCW circles have been imbued with a Protestant spirit? Kiko’s teachings have long avoided or undermined specifically Catholic doctrines. He is notably silent on the Holy Trinity, dismissive of purgatory, and fond of Luther-esque interpretations on salvation and sin (for example, instructing his followers to “not resist evil” even in the face of grave injustice). The NCW’s own professors have even taught that “Jesus became a sinner” – a horrifying claim that surfaced in an NCW seminary lecture. Such doctrinal poison is part and parcel of the NCW formation. Before Vatican II, any group teaching that Christ’s Eucharistic presence “is not absolute” or calling pious Catholics “pagans” would have been denounced as heretical. Yet the post-Conciliar hierarchy has given Kiko’s Way repeated passes, allowing it to correct “a few little mistakes” here and there and carry on.

Perhaps most disturbing is that the NCW’s catechisms remain secret; accessible only to its leaders and never published for the broader Catholic faithful. Despite Cardinal Ratzinger ordering an examination of these texts as far back as 1997, the NCW still shrouds its doctrines in semi-secrecy. Former members attest that in local communities, the original teachings (errors and all) are often still taught orally, never having really been expunged. This cult-like secrecy around doctrine should alarm any Catholic. The Church of Christ does not have “secret teachings” for an elite. That is the modus operandi of Gnostic cults. But the Neo-Catechumenal Way, in practice, operates more like a secretive sect than a transparent Catholic organization.

Beyond liturgy and doctrine, the internal practices of the NCW are more akin to a 1970s cult than any Catholic parish mission. Central to the Way’s method are the infamous “Scrutinies” – intense, invasive interrogations of members at various stages of their indoctrination. In the First Scrutiny (after about two years in the group), members are forced to undergo a public examination of conscience in front of their entire community. NCW catechists demand that the person “prove” their detachment from material “idols” by surrendering something of great value (it could be money, jewelry, even the deed to a property) ostensibly to be given anonymously to the poor.

The individual is also compelled to confess their most personal sins and struggles openly, with the catechists probing for maximum humiliation. One ex-NCW member described how every “brother” and “sister” had to reveal their deepest secret or fault before the assembly; an ordeal often accompanied by tears, trembling, and extreme psychological pressure. If someone hesitated to divulge a particularly sensitive matter (say, marital infidelity or abuse), the NCW leaders would insist, implying that failure to confess publicly means one is not “truly free” or lacks faith.

Many souls have been traumatized by this abuse of authority; it is a gross violation of the internal forum of conscience that the Church’s sacrament of confession protects. As one commentator observed, the NCW essentially turned what should be a private confession to God into a voyeuristic group spectacle: “Things which the Church wisely regards as sacrosanct between one’s conscience, one’s confessor and God’s infinite mercy may now be required public knowledge.”

The Second Scrutiny, a few years later, is even more appalling. In this ritual, a member must sit on a chair in the center of a room facing a large crucifix, surrounded on all sides by a panel of NCW “scrutineers” (including priests) and an audience of community members (sometimes even members from other communities – i.e. strangers) . The leaders repeatedly remind the “victim” that lying or withholding information is equivalent to lying to Christ Himself, since they are under the crucifix’s gaze.

Then the interrogation begins: a barrage of deeply personal questions, often delving into sexual morality and family life. For example, a married couple with only two children might be asked: “You have been married ten years but only have two kids – how have you achieved this if you haven’t used artificial contraception?.” In NCW logic, fewer children is evidence of grievous sin that must be exposed. Members have been forced to confess before the whole assembly if they practiced birth control or even to reveal past infidelities (long forgiven in sacramental confession) so that their spouse and everyone else can hear it.

The damage to marriages and families caused by these public “scrutinies” is incalculable. Such revelations made in an atmosphere of coercion and groupthink have led to destroyed trust and even canonical annulments. In one outrageous case, NCW leaders advised a member to seek an annulment under the Pauline Privilege, as if her Catholic spouse were an “unbeliever” obstructing her faith, purely because the spouse refused to join the NCW. The NCW literally encouraged breaking apart a valid Catholic marriage in favor of loyalty to the sect. This is cult behavior, plain and simple.

Let’s be clear: nothing in authentic Catholic pastoral practice sanctions this kind of spiritual abuse. The seal of confession exists to protect the faithful from exactly such humiliation, and the Church has always condemned anything remotely like these “scrutinies.” Canon law forbids a priest from even indirectly inducing a penitent to divulge their confession. Yet NCW catechists (often laypeople with no theological training) presume to drag the most intimate secrets out of people in public.

Secular psychologists recognize these tactics as classic brainwashing and group control techniques. By forcing total disclosure and “absolute obedience” to the group leaders, the NCW systematically breaks down individual will. Members who pass the Second Scrutiny are then bound even tighter to the Way: they are now required to turn over 10% of their income as tithe directly to the NCW; not to their parish, not to any charity, but straight into the NCW’s coffers. From that point, every paycheck, every dollar a member earns, 1/10th must go into the opaque NCW “bag” (which, in a mocking twist, they call “the garbage” to signify contempt for money ).

And opaque it is; the NCW publishes no financial accounts and offers zero transparency. Former members recount that any inquiry about where the money goes is rebuffed with spiritual gaslighting: “Your money is an idol for you; you lack faith, you’re not generous!.”It is estimated that the Neo-Catechumenal Way has millions of dollars flowing through its communities worldwide, completely unaccounted for. How much of it lines the pockets of its jet-setting founders and leaders? Only God knows. The NCW’s finances are as secret as its catechisms. We do know they have built lavish facilities like the $60 million Domus Galilaeae in Israel, and that Kiko Argüello enjoys the life of a well-heeled guru traveling the globe.

The NCW leadership also isn’t above outright fraudulent tricks to squeeze more money from members. One documented scam: at NCW gatherings, leaders secretly seed the collection bag with large bills from a central stash, then announce an inflated total. For instance, you might put $10 in thinking others will too, but then the leader triumphantly declares “We collected $3,000!” (far beyond what the group present could reasonably give). Everyone feels ashamed for being “stingy” and resolves to give far more next time. In truth, the leaders had covertly dumped $2,000+ into the basket to guilt-trip everyone.

This “sick scam,” as one ex-member called it, has been reported by former NCW members across multiple countries, evidence that it’s mandated from the very top of the organization. When a shocked member in Rome realized she had been enlisted to help perpetrate this deception, she protested to an NCW priest, who replied that she “shouldn’t be so judgmental.” Let that sink in: a Catholic priest associated with the NCW justified blatant lying and manipulation of the faithful, dismissing righteous anger as “being judgmental.” This is the moral rot that pervades the NCW’s leadership culture.

Given all this, it is undeniable that from any objective standpoint, the Neo-Catechumenal Way functions as a cult inside the Church. Faithful Catholics in many dioceses have seen it firsthand and cried out in alarm. In Guam, for example, locals formed a group “Concerned Catholics of Guam” to expose NCW abuses. They described the NCW’s presence as “toxic” and “colonizing” their diocese . The movement became a flashpoint in Guam’s Catholic crisis, contributing to financial ruin and even playing a role in the downfall of Archbishop Anthony Apuron.

Apuron, a devoted NCW supporter who handed over Guam’s seminary to NCW control, was later convicted of sexually abusing minors. While the NCW wasn’t directly accused in those crimes, Apuron’s case illustrated a troubling pattern: bishops who ally with the NCW often run their dioceses into the ground, spiritually and financially. Before Apuron was removed, the Agana Cathedral was $2 million in debt and weekly protestors picketed outside with signs against NCW influence . Only after Rome imposed a new bishop were reforms made: the NCW was ordered to halt expansions, its illicit seminary was shut down, and property that Apuron had secretly deeded to NCW control was returned to the diocese.

Again, note: even the post-Vatican II Vatican eventually had to intervene to limit NCW abuses in Guam, tacitly admitting that the “Way” had wrought havoc there. The Conciliar Vatican timidly tinkers at the margins, leaving the wolf to roam among the sheep.

If the Neo-Catechumenal Way is so obviously rife with error and abuse, one must ask: why has Rome allowed it to spread? The uncomfortable answer is that the post-Vatican II establishment, from Paul VI onward, has been enamored of lay “movements” as engines of the New Evangelization, no matter how un-Catholic their methods. The NCW in particular found favor at the highest levels.

To Catholics, this unearned approbation was a slap in the face: how could the Vatican bless a group that treats the Tridentine Mass, the Mass of the saints, as “wrong” and replaces it with Kiko’s DIY liturgy? How could Rome wink at NCW teachings that had to be literally censored for heresy while cracking down on traditionalists for far lesser “offenses”?

This is the inversion of values that Catholics deplore in the Conciliar Church. Under the “dictatorship of novelty,” any movement that draws people with guitars and emotional experiences (no matter how heterodox) is lauded as a work of the Spirit, while those clinging to the perennial Mass and catechism are marginalized as “rigid.” The Neo-Catechumenal Way is the poster child of this tragic double standard.

All this reached a new height of absurdity with the recent papal address of Leo XIV to the NCW on January 19, 2026. In this speech, delivered in the Aula della Benedizione and addressed to NCW leaders including Kiko himself, Leo XIV positively fawned over the Way. He praised their “precious contribution” to evangelization and thanked them for “reawakening the faith” in secularized regions.

He singled out NCW families who abandon everything to go on mission, extolling them as model evangelizers. Not once did he acknowledge the massive trail of problems the NCW has left or the serious concerns raised by pastors for decades. At most, Leo XIV offered a token warning about the dangers of feeling superior or creating a “parallel Church;” an irony, since the NCW is a parallel church in practice.

But the real kicker was Leo’s admonition to the NCW not to be too strict in preaching morality. In his address, Leo XIV insisted that “the proclamation of the Gospel…must always be free from forms of coercion, rigidity, and moralism, so that they do not arouse feelings of guilt and fear instead of inner liberation.” Leo XIV is effectively telling a group that has institutionalized coercion and guilt-tripping (remember those “scrutinies”) that the real danger is being too rigid or making people feel guilty.

Leo XIV sounds less like a Vicar of Christ and more like a therapist preaching self-esteem. He is urging the NCW, of all groups, to make sure no one feels “guilt” or “fear” when they evangelize. The Gospel without guilt or fear is not the Gospel of Christ at all, as any pre-conciliar catechism would attest. Our Lord’s first public word was “Repent!” which implies acknowledging one’s guilt before God. Scripture says “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” (Prov 1:7).

But Leo XIV, in true modernist fashion, cherry-picked 2 Corinthians 3:17 (“where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom”) to imply that evangelization should never make anyone uncomfortable about their sins. This is a false mercy and a false gospel. As a commentator dryly noted, “A Gospel of ‘inner liberation’ without ‘feelings of guilt and fear’ would certainly appeal to sinful man, but it is NOT the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” Leo’s address perfectly encapsulates why the Conciliar Church is in crisis: it praises those who introduce novelties and errors, and it downplays the very elements of conversion (fear of God, sense of sin) that authentic Catholicism has always inculcated.

Leo XIV’s address to the Neocatechumenal Way is scandalous and further proof that the post-Vatican II hierarchy has lost the plot. Instead of heeding the pleas of faithful Catholics and even Conciliar bishops who have experienced the NCW’s divisive, cultish activity, Leo chooses to publicly extol this sect.

He even had the gall to warn traditional Catholics (thinly veiled as those guilty of “rigidity” and “moralism”) while standing in front of a movement that embodies the worst excesses of fanaticism and heterodoxy within the Church. It’s as if the high priest in the temple found the money-changers and not only refused to drive them out, but thanked them for their “contribution” and told the true worshippers to lighten up!

The fact that the Conciliar popes have coddled and celebrated the NCW is a damning indictment of the new orientation that Vatican II ushered in.

Measured against the yardstick of Tradition, the Neo-Catechumenal Way stands condemned. Its theology is shot through with Protestant and modernist errors; its liturgy is a man-made pastiche that trivializes the Holy Mass; its methods are abusive and sectarian; its fruits are division, confusion, and a cult of personality. In the era of Pope St. Pius X (who famously crushed the Modernist movement), or Pope Leo XIII, or any pre-conciliar pope, the NCW would never have been approved; in fact, it likely would have been put on the Index of Forbidden movements and its leaders disciplined for spreading dangerous doctrines.

In Galatians 1:8, St. Paul warns: “Even if an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which we preached, let him be anathema.” The NCW, with its “new gospel” of feel-good salvation history and its disdain for traditional Catholic worship, has been preaching a different gospel for decades. And the Vatican, rather than anathematizing it, has been praising it to the skies.

For those of us holding fast to tradition, this is confirmation that the institutional structures in Rome are occupied by men who do not possess the spirit of Truth. Leo XIV’s glowing address to Kiko’s sect is just the latest proof that the Conciliar Church will call evil good and good evil, praising a sect that should be suppressed, while vilifying traditional Catholics who only desire to worship as our forefathers did.

The Neo-Catechumenal Way should be abolished for the good of souls. Every day it operates, it blasphemes the Holy Mass, scandalizes the little ones, and sows errors in minds and hearts. It treats its own members cruelly, all while convincing them that they are the enlightened “chosen” ones. In a healthier time, Holy Mother Church would never allow a wolf like this to roam free among Christ’s flock. Until we have a pope again who will defend orthodoxy and orthopraxy with vigor, groups like the NCW will continue to run wild. Faithful Catholics must be warned: “By their fruits you shall know them” (Matt. 7:16). The fruits of the Neo-Catechumenal Way (disobedience, discord, secret teachings, broken families, and doctrinal corruption) are rotten to the core.

In the final analysis, Kiko’s “Way” is not the Way of Christ. It is a counterfeit path born of the 1960s turmoil, approved by credulous Churchmen under a “spirit of Vatican II” optimism that blinded them to its faults. We who stand on the solid ground of Tradition reject it entirely. We echo the Japanese bishops’ plea that went unheeded: the NCW causes “deep and painful suffering” in the Church. It needs to be cast out of the vineyard. And we pray for the day when a true Pope will once again “drive out the merchants” and restore the beauty of holiness in the Church, so that dangerous movements like the Neo-Catechumenal Way are given no quarter, and the faithful can once again hear the pure, unadulterated Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ; a Gospel that calls us to have holy fear of God, to feel healthy guilt for sin, and to “bring forth fruits worthy of penance” in the one true Way of salvation, the Holy Catholic Church.

John Paul II not only praised the Way repeatedly but also personally ordained NCW priests and dispatched NCW families as missionaries. In 2002 he approved the NCW statutes (ad experimentum), and by 2008 the Vatican gave final approval to the NCW’s charter and some of its unique liturgical practices. Benedict XVI likewise spoke positively of the NCW’s zeal (even as he cautioned them to respect liturgical norms ).
To Catholics, this unearned approbation was a slap in the face: how could the Vatican bless a group that treats the Tridentine Mass, the Mass of the saints, as “wrong” and replaces it with Kiko’s DIY liturgy? How could Rome wink at NCW teachings that had to be literally censored for heresy while cracking down on traditionalists for far lesser “offenses”?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

The Neo-Catechumenal Way: Leo XIV Praises a Modernist Cult

NeoCats Ping