Skip to comments.
Why Christianity ?
Jack Hibbs ^
| May 10, 2025
| Jack Hibbs
Posted on 05/10/2025 8:27:25 AM PDT by knarf
48 minutes of assurance, re-assurance or conviction.
TOPICS: Apologetics; History; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: christian; christianity; jackhibbs
1
posted on
05/10/2025 8:27:25 AM PDT
by
knarf
To: knarf
Good question, since the term isn’t even in the Bible.
And there is a much better term.
2
posted on
05/10/2025 8:46:43 AM PDT
by
FNU LNU
( )
To: knarf
WHY CHRISTIANITY?"Christianity doesn't save. Christ saves." CS Lewis, in a private letter to William Steuart McBirnie.
3
posted on
05/10/2025 9:03:37 AM PDT
by
Hebrews 11:6
(“…all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” Acts 13:48)
To: FNU LNU
But the term *Christian* is.
The disciples were first called Christians in Antioch.
Honestly, yes, religion doesn’t save but criticizing the use of the term Christianity, which is informative, seems like hair splitting.
4
posted on
05/10/2025 9:27:56 AM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesu)
To: metmom
the word “Bible “ isn’t found in the Bible. People say there is no Rapture because that word isn’t in the Bible. It’s actually Harpazo. Harpazo is greek and Raptura is Latin. The Bible usually isn’t in Latin. Especially for Protestants.
5
posted on
05/10/2025 9:39:08 AM PDT
by
Strict9
To: FNU LNU
6
posted on
05/10/2025 10:22:53 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: Hebrews 11:6
7
posted on
05/10/2025 10:23:40 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: knarf; lightman
8
posted on
05/10/2025 10:33:45 AM PDT
by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: Honorary Serb
I think everyone is missing the point . . . . probably because they did not listen, but are responding to the title.
Jack Hibbs provides very clear understanding for those of us that sometimes need help in articulating the Gospel message, attempting to get the lost INTERESTED in seeking further, if not getting saved.
I confess . . . at 77 with relatively clear intellectual abilities, I fumble for words to say at various times.
Faith cometh by hearing . . . . . and hearing by the word of God
9
posted on
05/10/2025 10:42:10 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: knarf
I had no doubt that Hibbs would get it right. I just wanted to memorialize Lewis’ pithy quote.
10
posted on
05/10/2025 11:03:19 AM PDT
by
Hebrews 11:6
(“…all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” Acts 13:48)
To: knarf
I think everyone is missing the point . . . . probably because they did not listenYou can't miss a point when you don't know what it is which is the whole point of the FR tradition of commenting without listening.
To: Strict9
The Latin is a translation from the Greek.
English from the Latin Vulgate is a translation of a translation.
Best to go from the original language and lose as little in the translation as is necessary.
12
posted on
05/10/2025 12:29:07 PM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesu)
To: knarf
Why Christianity?
Because the gospel is found in it.
13
posted on
05/10/2025 12:29:43 PM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesu)
To: AndyJackson
14
posted on
05/10/2025 1:50:10 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: knarf; Lazamataz
Shouldn't require splainin. If I wasn't aiming at a duck when I pulled the trigger, you can't accuse me of missing the duck. Sometimes you just accept the fact that you bagged what you bagged when you fired the shot, whatever it was that you bagged, and if you didn't bag anything well that is the opposite of blind dumb luck. Some folks call it trolling, but that's probably off point too. In the military its called armed reconnaissance which is another version of FA to find out what's going around, which is maybe nothing and maybe gold in them thar hills. It's a deep problem in epistemology. How do you find something out when you don't know whether there is something to find out that you wanted to find out. Columbus found out, but what he found out wasn't what he was trying to find out. If he had known what he wanted to find out would he have gone anyway? There is a whole DEI culture that resents what Columbus discovered, although others argue that the Vikings and the Chinese got there first. Of course those who really got there first were the Indigenous people or the latest wave of migrating invaders, which is okay to be unless you are white European Christian.
I dunno. Seems this is more Laz's kind of thing so I am roping him in here.
To: AndyJackson
If I had any idea about what you are trying to say, I’d try to reply intelligently, but throwing in epistemology is apparently a shibboleth that never got to me.
16
posted on
05/10/2025 4:43:29 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: knarf
Well, if you don’t know what I am trying to say, that makes two of us.
To: knarf
At 78 it is a little late to explore other choices.
18
posted on
05/10/2025 4:56:18 PM PDT
by
Retain Mike
( Sat Cong)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson