Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fidelis

I don’t ascribe to any “systematic” theology theories, but just because lots of people before or after a certain time believed something should be taken as warning sign to not base one’s beliefs on those of others, rather let the scripture and the Holy Spirit be your guide.

So, If the bible is not *clear* on a certain topic, it should be held in tension - not used as a foundation to build a set of beliefs that are not clearly taught in scripture.

Phil 2:12


9 posted on 05/19/2024 2:59:03 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BereanBrain
I don’t ascribe to any “systematic” theology theories, but just because lots of people before or after a certain time believed something should be taken as warning sign to not base one’s beliefs on those of others, rather let the scripture and the Holy Spirit be your guide.

I happen to agree with you, but it does weigh in as a factor, especially if one does not ascribe to Sola Scriptura, which itself is not attested to in Scripture. If one comes up with a novel doctrine that has never been embraced for the first 1600 years of Christianity, one must read extremely lightly and be sure that one is not following a different spirit than the one that has led all other Christians up to that time.

2 Corinthians 11:3-5

21 posted on 05/19/2024 3:53:39 PM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson