They have made a covenant with death 💀💀💀
and with Hell are they at agreement
Posted on 12/09/2023 8:57:34 PM PST by Morgana
It’s no secret that the liberal ladies of ABC’s The View love abortion and despise pro-lifers. Earlier this year, they brought on far-left extremist Jane Fonda who told them that her final solution to pro-lifers was to “murder” them, which they did not push back on. Well, on Friday, co-host and pro-choice radical Sara Haines suggested that pro-lifers should stop receiving life-saving medical treatments because it was “God’s will” that they die, and that they were hypocrites for doing so.
Haines’s hate-filled attacks against pro-lifers came in response to the recent abortion court ruling in Texas. “Yeah, and this example should be one of the easy ones, because this actually also risked her future fertility and she wants to grow her family more and, of course, the baby is going to pass, all those things,” she said.
“[I]t’s also not a universal truth when life begins,” she falsely proclaimed.
Despite being a mother herself, and her claims that she wanted to be a minister at one point in her life, Haines whined about people describing pregnancy as “a miracle” and “God’s will.”
Her swipes at pro-lifers grew more disturbing and dangerous as she declared that pro-lifers were hypocrites for receiving life-saving treatments for cancer and other ailments instead of just dying as part of “God’s will”:
[I]f it’s God’s will on the way in, it should be God’s will on the way out too. That brings into question are you taking heart attack medication? Are you treating your cancer? Are you dying when you said you should? Because if we’re going to argue about life in, then let’s be honest about life out. Don’t go to the hospital if you’re hurting because it is God’s will. Like, I don’t like the inconsistencies and the hypocrisy when people weaponize religion on this issue.
Receiving cancer treatment to extend one’s life is not going against God’s will. Butchering an unborn baby out of convenience was. If one received treatment and still passed away, that’s God’s will. Haines’s comments also betrayed her profound ignorance of the pro-life approach to end-of-life care and being opposed to medically assisted suicide, which is a closer analogy to abortion.
Our friends at LifeNews responded to Haines’s comments about when life began in a post on X:
Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics, 1974, pages 17, 23, J.P. Greenhill and E.A. Freidman: “The term conception refers to the union of the male and female pronuclear elements of procreation from which a new living being develops. It is synonymous with the terms fecundation, impregnation, and fertilization … The zygote thus formed represents the beginning of a new life.”
And despite there being two purported “conservatives” on the panel, neither of them pushed back on Haines’s disgusting demand for pro-lifers to die.
Faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin used the worn-out trope that pro-lifers were “the dog that was chasing the car” and finally caught it with the overturning of Roe v. Wade. “[Republicans] wanted to take back abortion rights because I think it was this sort of, you know, ethereal – like it’s a bunch of women who are getting elective abortions casually as a second form of birth control,” she huffed.
The other fake conservative, Ana Navarro suggested that pro-life policies were not about being pro-life but rather being “pro-cruelty and pro-inhumanity.”
“ not sure any of those old hens on The View even believe in God.”
That’s the funny or absurd part.
Sara Haines was pathetic for what she was saying on the View.
“ She has no business discussing what is or is not G-d’s will. I’m sure He and she are perfect strangers.”
None of us do, really, except that it is done on Earth as it is in Heaven.
God’s will be done. God permits women to kill their baby and the resulting misery nudges them slowly toward repentence or further denial and further misery. After death, either continues for eternity.
Wonder how this women would feel if someone suggested she save the world from “overpopulation” by undergoing a “post” partum abortion on her own self!
Whether they believe in God or not, it’s best not to take advice on how Christians should act from people who celebrate the slaughter of the most innocent of human life.
They speak with tongues of demons.
The hospital as we know it is the result of the Christian worldview. If this hag was around in pre-Christian Rome and was ill she would have been taken in to get her off the streets and not to care for her. Healing was for the military mostly. Christians introduced the concept of opening the doors to the general populace, not to hide them away, but to care and get them back on their feet if possible
My current belief is that such people have those traits revealed.
“Circumstances do not make a man, they reveal him.”
— Wayne W. Dyer ·
I'm guessing she was a mom to more than three?
The three children she has now are the ones she didn't have killed in her womb?
Women don't deal with the fact that they want to be able to have their babies killed.
They want to tell themselves that it's (abortion) something other than what it is.
It’s hard to wrap my mind around the warped logic of this hag, but I guess she’s trying to argue that:
A. Pro-lifers think that pregnancy is a natural outcome of sexual intercourse and thus is God’s will.
B. Diseases, illnesses and debilitating conditions occur naturally too, so they must be God’s will too.
C. Why are pro-lifers okay with thwarting God’s will for B but not B?
Needless to say, there are multiple flaws in this argument. First of all, the main pro-life argument is that abortion is a homicidal act, i.e., a living, distinct human being is being intentionally killed. Some pro-lifers may believe that every pregnancy is “God’s will,” but other pro-lifers aren’t even necessarily religious. It’s simply false to pretend that “God’s will” is the core, mainstream argument against abortion.
Second, she’s basically saying that abortion is analogous to treating diseases, illnesses and debilitating conditions. That’s false. Treating diseases is about *preserving* human life, abortion is about destroying human life.
“… this actually also risked her future fertility”
Btw. In what exact way?
Lies
Sarah sounds like an Ivy league college president. And that’s not a compliment. These liberal women are anti life.
I suspect that abortion triggers the bio-chemical events that cause cancer. For example, the female breasts undergo a tremendous change during pregnancy in-order to facilitate lactation. When the pregnancy is terminated there is something that affects that process. Whatever it is, women most likely develop breast cancer. Abortion may also trigger cervical cancer. When pregnancy occurs, the cervix will rise up and become soft. That process may have cancerous side effects when the pregnancy is terminated.
From this study:
“An interrupted pregnancy does not seem to impart the long-term protective effect of a full-term pregnancy attributable to terminal differentiation of the mammary tissue, and the incomplete differentiation may render it more susceptible to carcinogenic agents.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7705945/
Revelation 20:11-15
King James Version
11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2020%3A11-15&version=KJV
The whores of The View are the breed of. I steer that would cheer the burning of whites in ovens. Every one of them is a genocidal bitch.
The Spew host
Did Sara make a video of her meeting with God when he told her his intentions?
People who ‘presume’ to know God’s intentions should read the Bible ... it’s all there. Of course now I am presuming 2 things: she knows what the Bible is & she can read.
Irrelevant. They are trolling. And it works. They get attention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.