quote:
“” THE WORD BECAME FLESH”
Did he eat the book?”
_______________________
That reminds me of another false doctrine. transubstantiation. We are not cannibals, and neither is some man with a turned around collar, able to create God every Sunday.
To take what is meant as a MEMORIAL and to pervert the Sacrifice is an abomination unto the Lord!
BTW Ebb, thank you for posting this thread. I hope you haven’t grown to regret it.
It's funny how they take that literally (ignoring context, reason, and every other exegetical interpretation of “Take, eat; this is my body.” [Matthew 26:26]) and use it to mean their "holy Eucharist" sustains their righteousness (until next week); and yet, they MISS the explicit meaning of so much else in Scripture, relying on their magisterium to supply their understanding of who God is and what He wants from His people (unless it's their current "pope").
Run-on sentence? yes.
Since the consumption of blood is STRICTLY prohibited by God, before the Law was give, under the Law, and in the church age at the council at Jerusalem (Acts 15), any doctrine that requires it is false, as it demands people do what God forbids.
But then again, that is par for the course with Catholicism.
Like *Call no man Father.*